Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> BOA ADJUSTMENT MINUTES <br /> 1/28/99 Page 3 <br /> 2) . At the time existing buildings were built (pre-1973) <br /> sideyards in the commercial district were zero. <br /> 3) . Rearyards, when structures were built, were required to be <br /> 10 feet. <br /> 4) . Applicant has requested Board to grant sideyard variances <br /> to existing structures to precipitate certified survey approval. <br /> 5) . Applicant has withdrawn requested variance from number of <br /> parking stalls required. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1) . Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the <br /> public interest. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> APPEALS FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS: <br /> #2981. Vacek - Albion - 9/24/98 P.H. <br /> Appearances: J. Roethe, K. Vacek and J. Gregorius <br /> KAY/LONG to find that the fireplace addition be considered an <br /> improvement to the residence and therefore its value is to be <br /> included when computing utilizing the 50% rule. Motion carried <br /> 5-0. <br /> KAY/ROSS to find that the bay window addition (to the garage <br /> side of residence) be considered an improvement to the residence <br /> and therefore its value is to be included when computing <br /> utilizing the 50% rule. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> ROSS/LONG to find that the garage addition, that was added in <br /> 1981, be considered an improvement to the residence and <br /> therefore its value is to be included when computing utilizing <br /> the 50% rule. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> ROSS/KLOPP to accept $18, 597 . 66 as the dollar amount figure to <br /> which is the amount of repair/addition/alteration anticipated by <br /> applicant to be completed and that number is less than the 50% <br /> maximum allowed by ordinance. motion carried - 4-1. <br /> (Bitzer, no) . <br /> KLOPP/ROSS to grant a variance of 1.5 feet form required right <br /> sideyard to permit bay window as constructed. Motion failed - <br /> 2-3. (Kay, Long and Bitzer - no) . <br /> Finding of Fact: <br /> 1) . Applicant proposes and has commenced modifications and <br /> additions to an existing residence within the flood-fringe area <br /> of Lake Koshkonong. <br /> 2) . Applicant has withdrawn, from the Boards consideration, <br /> setback variance for bay window and sideyard variance for <br /> chimney by opting to remove both fireplace and bay window. <br /> 3) . Porch addition will also be removed to comply with the 50% <br /> requirement and square footage maximum. Section 17 .53 (3) (b) and <br /> (c) Dane County Code of Ordinances. <br />