DCPREZ-0000-05026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'Y w. This is the landscape context in which I have expressed concern about the location of the access drive proposed by the Maurers. If the west side of Timber Lane were already as split up for development as the east side of Timber Lane the location of another driveway would hardly make any difference. However, because the landscape in its largest features (the glacial lake basins) is still intact and not split into small units the location of the first driveway into that landscape is very significant. You can choose to either respect the shape of the land as given to us by the glaciers of the Ice Age or you can choose to follow our arbitrarily imposed rectangular survey system. Given the significance of these resources I think it is important to choose the former approach. I have looked over the Maurer property and the adjacent land from Timber Lane and I offer the following suggestions based upon what I saw there: 1 ) I agree with Tom Maurer that the alternate driveway location I suggested in my letter of August 12, 1991 to Mr.& Mrs. Johan Glaaser is not a very desirable one from several perspectives. 2) I observed that the concern expressed by Johan Glaaser for a driveway that provides safe access to Timber Lane with adequate sight distance for oncoming traffic is not very well met by a driveway along the north edge of the Maurer property. The site distance south to the blind crest of Timber Lane is only about 400 feet. 3) Both Johan Glaaser's concern for a safe access drive to Timber Lane and my concern for the presevation of the integrity of the glacial lake basin can be nicely met by putting the access drive on the crest of the ridge so that it enters Timber Lane opposite the existing drive from the stable across the road. The driveway could follow the ridge crest in a meandering course to the chosen homesite, providing a pleasant view for approaching the house. The site distance along Timber Lane is far better in both directions than in either of the previously proposed driveway locations. This driveway location would also minimize disruption of the cropland. I have identified this proposed driveway location on the attached maps and aerial photo. 4) The area north of this suggested driveway is approximately 12 acres. As I mentioned in my letter of August 12, 1991 the Ice Age Park & Trail Foundation would happily offer to purchase this parcel from the Maurers, either now or at some convenient time in the future, perhaps when the house is built. As you know the Foundation's offer to purchase would be based upon a fair market appraisal of the property. As mentioned in my August 12, 1991 letter, if the Foundation acquires this land we would most likely restore it to prairie or grassland. In this case the driveway along the ridge crest would form a natural firebreak for the controlled burns used to maintain the prairie. I believe the location I am suggesting for the driveway and the offer of the Foundation to purchase the land north of the driveway are a fair and mutually beneficial way to accommodate the Maurer and Glaaser families desire to enjoy their land while preserving the important natural resources located there for long-term public enjoyment, as well. I ask that you approve their request for re-zoning conditioned upon the location of the access driveway along the ridge crest as I have suggested. cc. Bill Fleck Jim Mueller, Dane County Parks Department Tom Smiley, Dane County Regional Planning Commission Mr.& Mrs. Johan Glaaser Thomas Maurer