|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2009-00025
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2000s
>
2009
>
DCPZP-2009-00025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2016 1:41:48 PM
Creation date
8/15/2016 11:40:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2009-00025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 3 <br /> Jim <br /> From: Jim Knowles [mailto:james.knowles @jdknowles.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 9:13 AM <br /> To: Peterson, Cami L - DNR; 'Eric.Heggelund @Wisconsin.gov' <br /> Subject: Wetland Site Review <br /> Good Morning, <br /> Eric and I talked briefly this morning about a site in the Town of DeForest that has a need for us to review <br /> a wetland line that was approved by both the WDNR and COE in 1998. At the time the approvals were <br /> issued the site was farmed so the wetland boundary was determined primarily upon soils and hydrology. <br /> Today, the site is vegetated with a mixture of upland and wetland plants which give the impression that <br /> the wetland line has moved upslope. I looked at the site this past week, augured three test holes down to <br /> 30 inches along the slope from high to low-from 60 feet upslope of the mapped wetland line down to the <br /> wetland line, and found approximately 24 inches of colluvium deposits over the native soils. I did not find <br /> any signs of redox in the colluvium layer which suggests to me that the site wetland line has not moved <br /> much if at all. However, some of the vegetation (reed canary grass and red osier dogwood) suggests that <br /> the wetland line has moved. To really answer this question we need to establish at least four transects <br /> and a minimum of 4 sample points per transect and get a very good look at soils. The vegetation on the <br /> site is quite typical and easy to identify: reed canary grass, red osier dogwood, common milkweed, <br /> Canada goldenrod, wild carrot, and Kentucky blue grass. Ground frost is all but absent due to the nice <br /> carpet of snow. I only found water at about 24 inches at the sample hole located adjacent to the former <br /> wetland line. Interestingly, there was about 24 inches of colluvium over the native soils and hydrology at <br /> the lowest sample point. <br /> Since the site was last mapped much of the upland areas have been developed so nearly all of the <br /> surface water runoff that once passed overland and into the wetland complex has been rerouted away <br /> from the site and now flows through a series of storm sewers and detention ponds. Sanitary sewer and <br /> water main construction may have likely interrupted groundwater flow as well. I would suspect that at a <br /> minimum that the site in question is actually drier than when first mapped in 1998. Finding ground water <br /> at 24 inches beneath the ground at the old wetland line did not surprise me. <br /> If we can meet at the site on Tuesday morning and do the work together I think we can get the line <br /> resolved quite quickly. <br /> One last item: Dane County is asking this be done because the land owner has a permit to construct a <br /> new multi-family building on the property. With the change in wetland setback criteria at the County level, <br /> the location of the wetland line must be verified for this reason alone. If we can work together to get this <br /> addressed before the ground frost shuts down the growing season that would be helpful to the County <br /> and to the land owner. <br /> Jim <br /> 1/28/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.