Laserfiche WebLink
To: 'Lane, Roger'; Peterson, Cami L- DNR Page 2 of 4 <br /> Cc: 'Schutte, Kristine'; 'Steinhauer, Charles'; 'Everson, Daniel'; Heggelund, Eric P - DNR; 'Gene Harbort' <br /> Subject: RE: Wetland Site Review <br /> Good Afternoon, <br /> I understand the issue and do agree that doing wetland delineations in the winter is problematic at best. <br /> The main issue there is whether or not soils are at or below 28 degrees; biological activity stops at that <br /> point. Without going into too much science and policy, I will mention that the growing season discussed in <br /> the 87 Manual is based upon agricultural - annual - crops that are susceptible to damage after the first <br /> major frost. So, growing season is based upon annual plants and not perennial plants. Many perennial <br /> plants continue to grow if the ground is not frozen and they are able to get plenty of sunlight. For <br /> example, red osier dogwood shrubs can continue to grow throughout the winter season as long the <br /> ground is absent frost within the plant's root zone. The 87 Manual does recognize that ground <br /> temperature should be measured this time of year. Never-the-less, NR 310 does contain language that <br /> states where environmental studies are done after November 15th and before March 15th the Department <br /> can table any reviews or decisions until such reviews are verified outside that winter period. So <br /> regardless of the growing season issues, the Department reserves the right to withhold reviews under that <br /> rule. <br /> One last item: the COE has issued a public notice about 8 years ago stating that growing season is not <br /> entirely based upon the USDA Soil Survey for a given county, but by the ground temperature and the <br /> presence/absence of ground frost. This past fall the COE issued supplemental guidelines that clarify that <br /> growing season is not based upon the soils manual but actual site conditions; that during winter months <br /> the growing can and in some cases does continue. <br /> As a compromise, I can easily determine the extent of wetlands on the site based upon soils at this time of <br /> year provided that the ground is not frozen. If the ground is frozen I can thaw out the soil with a torch and <br /> still obtain correct soil color designations which are a main key to determining the presence/absence of <br /> wetlands. Recall, that have been doing this work in Wisconsin for nearly 17 years with Dane County as <br /> one my areas while working for the COE. In fact, I did an on-site review of the original wetland mapping <br /> effort in 1994, 1997 and 1998 and approved the last wetland mapping effort. I can determine with a high <br /> degree of certainty whether or not the wetland line moved and how far. Also, other than the Kentucky <br /> blue grass growing under the snow it appears that much of the dominant vegetation on the site is still <br /> quite visible and quite identifiable. <br /> Well, give it some thought and please let me know what you wish to do. There is no frost in the ground so <br /> now is the time to do the work. <br /> Jim <br /> From: Lane, Roger[mailto:lane.roger @co.dane.wi.us] <br /> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:39 AM <br /> To:james.knowles @jdknowles.corn <br /> Cc: Schutte, Kristine; Steinhauer, Charles; Everson, Daniel <br /> Subject: RE: Wetland Site Review <br /> Mr. Knowles, <br /> Dane County Zoning Division will require that a new wetland delineation report be submitted in order to obtain a <br /> zoning permit for Lot 11, Holland Fields. This is due to the previous delineation being approximately 10 years old. <br /> Please see attached letter to the owner of Lot 11. <br /> If you have any questions, please give me a call. <br /> 1/28/2009 <br />