DCPREZ-0000-04925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i r . ' - • The land is all presently in an agriculture preservation dLstr-ict which allows no more than one dwelling per 40 acres. Haferman did not see the pr-oposel as a major overturning of the land- scape. She wanted to own a smaller parcel to be responsible for less in taxes. In discussion it was pointed out that lot 4 is unbuildable. stated no sense confirming for building if in tact Viste '��a�ed f'le saw n_ sense the lot is unbuildable with no available septic. Lot 1 is also too small for an RH zoning which is preferable. After• a basic discussion by the committee and viewing the map , the committee was leaning toward a subdividing of the lot into two parcels. Prior to public input , committee member Dennis Schafer stated that he would be abstaining from any voting because as a neighbor he is directly involved in the situtation but he would be expressing his views. Schafer made mention that comments made - would be directed to the petition and should not be taken as personal by Haferman. Schafer saw the petition as ill conceived to land use in this acre. When Haferman appeared informally June 25, 1990 to consider dividing off a acre plot , he had reservations but withheld them to see the final petition. Schafer stated the petition is radically different from original proposal and objects strongly to the petition as it exists now. Teitgen then opened the floor to public input. Adjoining property owners and neighbors Phyllis Willoughby, Tom and Eleanor Flinn, Russ and Gail Dengel , K1 over- and Dennis Schafer , and John Rosenbeck and Debra Shimon each appeared before the board with their objections. Copies of the letters each presented are included with the official minutes of the land plan committee. Each resident had a number of objections to the zoning petition. As discussion developed , there was a another questioning regarding the perking abibility on the lots, especially lot 4. Haferman then stated that lot 4 was unperkable for a septic. This information makes lot 4 an unbuildable lot. After discussion , Ha-Ferman stated she would be withdrawing her petition because she felt she knew how the committee would vote. She plans on re-discussing it with her father and then come back with another proposal . Based on this information the land plan committee did not vote on the petition proposal . (Lfioffical note: The feeling of the commitee was to reject the petition. ) In other business, Ben Hodgson requested information on the possiblity of his son building on some of his land. His son wants to build in 4 acre pasture. Hodgson is going to check with Dane County on how to obtain a 100 foot frontage to a public road �4. The n. for the property. There will be no December meeting as the 4th Monday is December - 24. scheduled meeting is January 28, 1991 with the _x„