Laserfiche WebLink
Dane County Agriculture, Environment and <br /> Land Records Committee <br /> October 23 , 1989 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Remember also that neither the Army Corps of Engineers nor the <br /> Department of Natural Resources have zoned this land as a wetland or <br /> shoreland. <br /> A majority of the neighboring landowners were not professionally <br /> trained as landscape architects or engineers, but they did express <br /> concerns about the impact of any R-4 development on the <br /> neighborhood. The various examples of adverse impact seemed to <br /> relate to an increase in housing density on Colladay Point . Most of <br /> these comments flatly asserted that R-4 zoning was not appropriate <br /> and that R-3 zoning was . In response to this position, I remind you <br /> first that zoning is, by its nature, a process of establishing <br /> districts with different densities and uses . Even though some of <br /> the owners might wish that all of the Town of Dunn were zoned either <br /> single-family or conservancy, that clearly is not possible. Look <br /> closely at the location of the subject property. It is completely <br /> surrounded by public streets and, as such, is a parcel of land which <br /> may appropriately be zoned in one or more classifications which are <br /> consistent with, but not necessarily identical to, the lands on the <br /> other side of the street . The land is bounded on the West by U. S . <br /> Highway 51 which is a busy, limited access road and major commercial <br /> thoroughfare. A gradual transition in use from single-family homes <br /> at the tip of the Point through low to medium density multi-family <br /> housing inland, with moderate highway-related retail business is <br /> clearly more appropriate than R-3 zoning . While it is true that the <br /> residents of such a development would be renters rather than owners <br /> and that some of them might have small children, neither of these <br /> are sufficient, or even permissible, grounds for rezoning . <br /> Ms . White, the only member of the Town Board to speak on the <br /> 10th, was perhaps most direct in discussing the value of the <br /> rezoning for the neighborhood and the Town. In response to a <br /> question, she acknowledged that the Town of Dunn has but two park <br /> sites currently, and both of them on Colladay Point . Lot 29 on the <br /> South side of the Point was apparently dedicated to the public for <br /> park purposes by the late Charles M. Colladay, who died in the <br /> Spring of 1948 . The other park, which she indicated was hardly <br /> recognizable as such, she said was the extension of Zor Court <br /> northward to the shoreline of Lake Kegonsa . When asked about plans <br /> for other parks , she admitted that the Town and its elected <br /> officials were very conservative in the expenditure of public <br /> monies . A nearly identical sentiment had been expressed by Mr . <br /> Minahan, Town Chair, at the time of the Town Board meeting on this <br /> Petition in September . In response to another question, Mr . <br /> Zarnsdorff , the landscape architect, indicated that the principal <br /> importance of the land to the community was its value as a <br /> playground. This sort of action, in which an owner of land is <br /> prevented from exercising the rights and privileges of that <br />