|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-04287
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-04287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2016 2:14:17 PM
Creation date
11/3/2016 2:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
04287
Town
Madison Township
Section Numbers
34
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-04287
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 .511%. Mme`. <br /> /4371) -2 6-7 <br /> July 12, 1988 <br /> Mr. Thomas Solberg, Chairman <br /> Town of Madison Town Board <br /> 2120 Fish Hatchery Rd. <br /> Madison, WI 53713 <br /> Dear Mr. Solberg, <br /> We would have presented this petition to you last evening at the <br /> Town hearing, but decided that a photocopy was needed to present <br /> at the zoning hearing this evening. <br /> We think many pertinent points were made by Loren Rathert re the <br /> homeowner-occuppied residential character of the neighborhood, the <br /> number of small children in the area to consider when adding the <br /> possibility of increased traffic, obviously the question of the <br /> effects of water runoff, addition of more undersized, undesirable <br /> rental units that would likely increase the problems already faced <br /> by an overtaxed town police service, etc. (see Mr. Rathert's letter <br /> dated July 6, 1988) . The professional comments by the UW architect <br /> concerning the lack of thought in sight and building design, the <br /> probable destruction of the western boundary tree line, and the un- <br /> availability of specifics on the part of the developer, were valid <br /> and well thought out. <br /> The developer appeared unwilling to discuss a decrease in density, <br /> or to commit to specifics on run-off, or a more suitable design for <br /> the sight before rezoning would take place. <br /> It is impossible for us as directly-concerned landowners to take <br /> anyone's word that these contingencies will be made to the granting <br /> of an R-4 rezoning. We feel that the contingencies must be agreed to <br /> in legal contract before a rezoning to R-4 can be considered. <br /> We have owned the property at 1505 Carver St. for a month short of <br /> 18 years, and have been directly involved with every proposal made <br /> for the disputed parcel when we were notified of it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.