Laserfiche WebLink
1 • <br /> 3 <br /> 4. That adequate utilities, access road, drainage and other necessary <br /> site improvements have been or are being provided. <br /> The matters of water, sanitary sewer and waste water drainage are <br /> certainly questionable, however, the biggest problem here is the <br /> access road. The intersection of Natvig Road and CTH "N" is already <br /> dangerous even for cars and bicycles because of its close proximity <br /> to the crest of the hill on "N". It certainly is no place for large <br /> slow-moving trucks to be entering the highway. This would add <br /> considerably to the danger of everyone who travels on CTH "N". <br /> 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide <br /> ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion <br /> in the public streets. <br /> Natvig Road is a narrow shoulderless street barely able to take care <br /> of the present and future'st*esidential traffic. Trucks using this <br /> street to a commercial recycling facility would be a delay, nuisance <br /> and most of all a danger to the residential auto, bicycle and pedestrian <br /> traffic. Much of the bicycle and pedestrian traffic is children and <br /> those big trucks and children don't belong on the same narrow street <br /> and we submit that the children come first. <br /> To summarize my reference to Section 10.255 of the Zoning Code, the Law <br /> says that a conditional use permit can notbe granted unless ALL of the above <br /> conditions are met. It seems clear that NONEof them have been met in this instance <br /> so it is further clear that a conditional use permit can not be granted. <br /> In the event the applicant contends that the Commercial Recycling Business <br /> use of the former landfill site is lawful because of its use as a landfill site <br /> at the time of the adoptions of the ordinance I submit the following: <br /> 1. The only thing it may have been at the time of the ordinance was <br /> a landfill site. The landfill site has now been closed so that <br /> is not a factor in this matter. <br /> 2. It was not a commercial recycling facility at the time of the <br /> ordinance so their is no justification for its acceptance now <br /> on that basis. <br />