1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA 9/29/89 Minutes Page 2 IN FAVOR: C. Haycock OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- #1902. Appeal by Carleton Kuenning for a variance from required sideyard as provided by Section 10.07(7) to permit addition to existing residence at 3007 Waubesa Avenue being Lot #10, Block #4, Waubesa Beach - Section 5, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: C. Kuenning OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board, letter from neighbor - Faber. #1903. Appeal by Scott & Monica Snittler for a variance from required sideyard as provided by Section 10.16 (6) (a) to permit construction of residential garage at 6755 Henry Road in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 14, Town of Montrose. IN FAVOR: S. & M Snittler OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- #1904. Appeal by Robert & Karen Vick for a variance from required setback to normal high watermark as provided by Section 11.03(2) to permit deck addition to existing building also for a Special Exception Permit as provided by Section 11.05(3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet of Lake Kegonsa at 3097 Sunnyside Street being Lots 30 and 31, Block #1, addition to Lee' s Park - Section 18, Town of Pleasant Springs. IN FAVOR: R. Vick OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. =1907. Appeal by David Zentmyer for a Special Exception Permit as provided by Section 11.05(3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet of Lake Mendota being Lot #10, West Point Park and part of Lot #1, Cedar Bay - Section 6 So. - Town of Westport. . IN FAVOR: D. Zentmyer OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Board rendered the following decisions: .t1-kert —iPC; #1823. Quackenbush/Jones to hold in abeyance until October public hearing pending Board viewing the property also to allow applicant to provide additional engineering data from an additional professional engineer. bioY--- ?vim -11896. Harvey/Quackenbush to grant waiver of screening requirement between commercial and residence zoned districts. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Occupant of residence sold off lands for commercial development and has no objection. 2) . Commercial uses are primarily all within newly constructed buildings and not close to residence. CONCLUSION: 1) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. Motion carried -1SCDIALks‘A- w5i;C' #1898. Quackenbush/Harvey to grant with conditions variance of 6 more or less feet from required right sideyard to permit 2nd story additions over existing residence.