|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPCUP-0000-00506
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPCUP-0000-00506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2017 11:17:48 AM
Creation date
2/1/2017 11:17:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
CUP
Petition Number
00506
Town
Oregon Township
Section Numbers
17
AccelaLink
DCPCUP-0000-00506
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. { • 7 •r , <br /> July 11 , 1986 <br /> Frill Fleck <br /> Administrator <br /> Dane County Zoning <br /> Room 116 <br /> City-County Butildinq <br /> 10 Monona Drive <br /> Madison, WI 5 3709 <br /> RE: Conditional-Use Fermi t #506 <br /> Letter by Richard and Mary Ashley t:7-7-8E:? <br /> Dear Mr . Fleck: <br /> At the public hearing held July 8 at the City-County <br /> Building I first became aware of a letter sent to your <br /> office by Richard and Mary Ashley concerning my request for <br /> a conditional-use permit so that I may utilize my 7 acre <br /> parcel as a private landing strip. <br /> As I rioted at the public hearing my immediate responses <br /> would be and were "off-the-cuff" and could not be <br /> substituted for prepared statements addressing each item <br /> described in the Ashley letter . I believe that this letter <br /> will clarify my position and provide a more thorough <br /> response to concerns expressed by the Ashleys. <br /> The Ashleys state that they have no objections to my <br /> request providing that a number of: restrictions are placed <br /> on the cconditional -us _. permit . T believe that I can <br /> accommodate the A5h1eys' '_on_erns with safety without <br /> h.Tt'-'.ii net Dane County impose undue and inappropriate <br /> restrictions on the conditional-use permit . <br /> Most of the Ashleys' concerns are already addressed by <br /> Federal Aviation Administration regulations which I will <br /> note here. The following is a review of each restriction <br /> proposed by the Ashleys and my response. <br /> ITEM #1 -- The airstrip is to be classified as a personal <br /> airstrips to wit,. only Mr . Neiman may use the airstrip. <br /> Although I will be the principle user of the airstrip , I <br /> have requested from the Federal Aviation Administration <br /> that our airstrip be classified as "private-restricted" to <br /> allow occ=asional use by invitees at some future date should <br /> I decide to lengthen the runway. At the runway' s current <br /> length I have no intentions on inviting anyone else to use <br /> the airstrip. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.