Laserfiche WebLink
' <br /> Lot #2 of CSM 4208 (2.44 acres) is proposed to receive 2.5 acres <br /> from Lot #4, giving it a total of 4.94 acres. If it were <br /> rezoned as proposed, you would have a 4.94 acre lot zoned RH-1 , <br /> when RH-2 would be a more appropriate district. <br /> Lot #3 (1 .84 acres) - No change is proposed. <br /> Lot #4 (16.23 acres) is proposed to be reduced by 7.5 acres, <br /> leaving a balance of 8.73 acres. At this size it can not be <br /> RH-4, however zoning it RH-1 would allow several potential <br /> additional lots. Therefore, I would suggest that the remaining <br /> portion of Lot #4 be rezoned to. RH-3. While the physical <br /> characteristics of the site 'may .limit development, RH-3 would <br /> simply clarify that there be no more lots. <br /> I .discussed the land division impacts with Norb Scribner who indicated <br /> that if the land is exchanged between. adjacent owners as described, <br /> no new parcel would be created. However, the attached 4 lot certified <br /> survey was approved one year ago and the division of any further lots <br /> within 5 years of that approval would require a preliminary and final <br /> ,plat as opposed to another CSM. <br /> From a plan policy perspective, the density limitation of one lot per <br /> 35 acres owned is in Deerfield's Town Plan as well as many others. <br /> The concept allows for some non-farm development, but there is a limit <br /> since it is a farmland preservation area. The provision is on page <br /> 5 of the Town Plan where it states: "Lands in 'the agriculture district <br /> should not be rezoned for non-farm residential development at an overall <br /> density of greather than one dwelling unit for 35 acres. " That number <br /> of lots allowed for this farm was approved in 1983. The creation of <br /> additional lots would be inconsistent with the. Town. Plan and the County <br /> Farmland Preservation Plan, which incorporate Deerfield's Plan as adopted <br /> county policy. The Dane County Farmland Preservation Plan was certified <br /> in 1981 by the State as complying with the standards of the Farmland <br /> Preservation Act, thereby making farmers eligible for tax credits. <br /> If further lot creation is desired and agreed upon, there is provision <br /> for amending the plan. The criteria for expanding the "Unsewered <br /> Development District" is found on page 8 of the Town Plan. There is <br /> also a provision for annually evaluating the plan's effectiveness. <br /> I would be happy to meet with the Town Plan Committee to assist with <br /> such a -re-evaluation. <br /> TLS:mml <br /> cc: Fred Nelson, Chairman, Town of Deerfield <br /> Art Mikkelson, Chairman Planning Commission <br /> Bill Fleck, County Zoning Administrator <br /> Norb Scribner, County Plat Review <br /> RPC- <br />