Laserfiche WebLink
AT THE NEXT TOWN BOARD MEETING I REPORTED THE PROBLEM OF THE <br /> STAND AND WE CONTINUED TO PURSUE INFORMATION FROM THE COUNTY <br /> ZONING AND TRAFFIC DEPARTMENTS. ON MAY 10, 1988, CURT <br /> ROEMING HAD REQUESTED HIS NAME BE PLACED ON OUR AGENDA. THE <br /> PUBLIC NOTIC, THEREFORE CARRIED HIS NAME, BUT THERE WERE NO <br /> DETAILS AS TO THE ISSUE HE WISHED TO DISCUSS. WHEN HIS TURN <br /> CAME, HE STOOD AND SAID THAT HE WAS REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD <br /> APPROVE THE OPERATION OF A MINATURE GOLF COURSE ON HIS <br /> PROPERTY. I RAISED THE IMMEDIATE ISSUE OF SAFETY AND ASKED <br /> THAT HE MOVE THE STAND BACK. HE RESPONDED THAT HE ENCOURAGED <br /> PEOPLE TO PARK OFF THE ROAD. HE SEEMED UNDECIDED AS TO <br /> EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF OPERATION HE WOULD EVENTUALLY HAVE AND <br /> MENTIONED THAT HE MAY NOT CHARGE FOR THE KIDS TO PLAY GOLF. <br /> MANY OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE ADJACENT TO 6476 LAKE ROAD WERE <br /> IN THE AUDIENCE FOR ANOTHER ISSUE. THEY DID HOWEVER, VOICE <br /> THEIR OPPOSITION TO HIS PROPOSAL. <br /> HIS NEXT APPEARANCE WAS BEFORE OUR PLAN COMMISSION ON MAY 23, <br /> 1988. THIS WAS ALSO OUR PUBLIC HEARING. WHILE I WAS UNABLE <br /> TO ATTEND THE MEETING, OUR PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES SAY THAT <br /> THE OPERATION WAS NOW DESCRIBED AS AN OUTDOOR AMUSEMENT PARK <br /> AND LIGHTED MINATURE GOLF COURSE. HE SAID HE PLANNED FOR OFF <br /> STREET PARKING. THE MINUTES ALSO REFLECT THAT "MANY <br /> RESIDENTS OF THE LAKE WINDSOR AREA APPEARED IN OPPOSITION <br /> CITING CHILD AND TRAFFIC SAFETY AS MAJOR CONCERNS." THEY <br /> ULTIMATELY VOTED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF HIS PROPOSAL. <br /> OUR PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THE JUNE 14, 1988 MEETING INCLUDED CURT <br /> ROEMING'S NAME AND THE PURPOSE OF HIS PROPOSAL. AS A RESULT, <br /> THERE WERE MANY LOCAL RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE. HOWEVER, WE <br /> WERE REQUESTED BY CURT ROEMING TO HOLD THE PETITION IN <br /> ABEYANCE. WE RECEIVED NO OTHER INFORMATION. THEREFORE, WE <br /> PASSED A MOTION TO HOLD IT IN ABAYANCE AT THE OWNER'S <br /> REQUEST, AND INSTRUCTED OUR CLERK TO NOTIFY YOUR COMMITTEE OF <br /> THE SAME. <br /> ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 15, I RECEIVED THE COUNTY NOTICE FOR THE <br /> APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. THE FRONT HAS <br /> STAMPED "PERSORT FIRST CLASS MAIL DATED APRIL 19, 88 AND <br /> ACROSS THE END IS ANOTHER METERED STAMP WITH NO AMOUNT DATED <br /> JUNE 14 88. <br /> ON THURSDAY I RECEIVED A CALL FROM A LOCAL RESIDENT SAYING <br /> THAT THERE WAS A PETITION REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THIS <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITTING ON THE COUNTER OF OUR LOCAL <br /> STORE AND THAT ALL OF THE KIDS WERE SIGNING IT. <br /> ON FRIDAY, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM ANOTHER LOCAL RESIDENT WHO <br /> HAD BEEN IN ATTENDANCE OF OUR TUESDAY NIGHT MEETING IN <br /> ANTICIPATION OF BEING ABLE TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. HE SAID THAT HE HAD HEARD THAT CURT <br /> ROEMING HAD ATTENDED THE COUNTY MEETING AND HAD PRESENTED THE <br /> PETITION AS EVIDENCE THAT ALL OF THOSE SIGNING HAD WANTED YOU <br />