|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-03829 (2)
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-03829 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2017 9:34:02 AM
Creation date
3/23/2017 9:33:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
03829
Town
Dunkirk Township
Section Numbers
6
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-03829
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> B.L. PETTY REZONING PETITION <br /> PRIOR PETITION NEW EVIDENCE/CHANGED CONDITIONS <br /> 1. Town Board supported Petty's request Same <br /> 2. Land in A-1 District Same <br /> 3. Neither town nor county preclude Same <br /> reasonable development of A-1 lands <br /> which are no longer suitable for <br /> agricultural uses. <br /> 4. Land division creates five parcels Creates three parcels <br /> Daughter builds on 5. 1 acres Daughter builds on 5.71 acres <br /> Friend builds on 1 acre Friend builds on 1.74 acres <br /> 5. Petty said he owned the land Petty is required to buy 5 acres <br /> or he forfeits his contract rights <br /> 6. Total acreage: 25.99 acres Same <br /> 8 acres farmable; balance woodland <br /> and wetland <br /> • <br /> 7. Some adjacent lands in A-1 zoning; some Same <br /> in residential development <br /> 8. Parcel suitable for farming. It has Same <br /> been farmed the last 10 years, at least. <br /> 9. Stoughton subdivision ordinance Stoughton's subdivision ordinance <br /> applicable according to city attorney ruled not applicable by city attorney <br /> 10. Stoughton Plan Commission did not Stoughton Plan Commission <br /> approve Petty's proposal; Stoughton unanimously approved Petty's <br /> City Council did not approve Petty's preliminary land division of two <br /> proposal lots; Stoughton City Council voted <br /> 11-1 to approve preliminary land <br /> division of two lots <br /> No indication from Plan Commission or Same <br /> City Council regarding environmental <br /> corridor or street/sewer easement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.