DCPREZ-0000-03965 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . . thus we have to rely on the good will of the operators who now work for Paulson , and as 1 explained , Mr . Paulson wasn ' t even able to get the first pit on Q filled . Now to get to the point of our opposition to allowing Mr. Paulson to sell off a portion of his land: It seems that the future development of any portion of his land may be the only leverage we wan find to make sure that all of these pits are reclaimed in an acceptable manner. If we allow him to do it now when he really hasn ' t lived up to his end of the bargain , we would be rewarding him for not carrying through on his promises. Hopefully in the future we will see a resolution to the problem of filling the pits, and then it would be appropriate to consider his request for a sale. Mr. Paulson knew all this when he bought his original parcel as many meetings and phone conversations were held. I might add that when Mr . Paulson first proposed the purchase of the land for a sand pit , he said the land was for that purpose , and the remainder would be farmed . No mention of homes was ever made. The second part of the concern on the part of the Fox Bluff residents is about future access to this parcel from the end of Sumac Circle. If you are familiar with this area, you know that it is a very quite neighborhood with short curving streets. Because of the wooded situation , all the corners a rclatively blind , and there are no sidewalks. It would be totally inappropriate and unacceptable to us for these roads to be used to gain access into the Paulson property. A road already exits into this property from Hwy. Q and any future development could use that one. The neighbors are not opposed to the construction of one house at the end of Sumac Circle if we could be sure that that lot would never be used for access into the rest of the