|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPCUP-2017-02374
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2017
>
DCPCUP-2017-02374
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2017 11:42:09 AM
Creation date
5/9/2017 11:31:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
CUP
Petition Number
02374
Town
Rutland Township
Section Numbers
1
AccelaLink
DCPCUP-2017-02374
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. . <br /> EVANS <br /> ,. ENGINEERING <br /> SOLUTIONS <br /> #2 Network Propagation Analysis <br /> A propagation study conducted by Verizon Wireless, which was examined by this consultant, <br /> shows that the area in question has pockets of underserved areas. An underserved area (either a <br /> weak signal or a lack of capacity), if not addressed, frequently results in reduced quality, <br /> dropped calls and slow or no internet connection in this area. A cellular network must be put <br /> together like pieces of a puzzle; each site is strategically located so that when the network is <br /> completed, a wireless subscriber can use his or her mobile device anywhere in the area without <br /> dropped connections. <br /> #3 Options for Co-Locating on an Existing Tower <br /> This consultant has confirmed that there are no federally-registered communication towers <br /> within Verizon's search ring, which has a radius of a half-mile from a point near the construction <br /> site proposed by Verizon. Thus, no discussion of alternative sites will be presented in this <br /> review. In the experience of this consultant, a distance of 0.5 mile is a reasonable radial distance <br /> for a cell site search area. The closest known antenna structure, the US Cellular tower, is 0.7 <br /> mile from the center of the search ring. <br /> #4 Proposed Antenna Array Height <br /> The cellular base station antenna height is dictated by the antenna height necessary for reliable <br /> coverage, which is influenced by topography and "look angle." Mounting the antennas too low <br /> above ground can cause the cellular base station signals to be degraded by hills and mature trees, <br /> which leads to cell phone call dropouts. This proposal appears to be reasonable at a maximum of <br /> 150 feet above ground level, considering that Verizon Wireless intends to enhance service in a <br /> wide area. <br /> #5 RF Exposure <br /> Although local governments are preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 from <br /> regulating RF emissions from wireless base station sites, nonetheless exposure to RF signals is <br /> generally a concern to some local government officials and residents. <br /> Exposure to RF signals from transmitting antennas is regulated by the Federal Communications <br /> Commission. The FCC standards, which were adopted by that agency in 1997, are based on RF <br /> exposure limits developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) <br /> and adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, <br /> "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 <br /> kHz to 300 GHz." At the time the ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 standards were being formulated, of <br /> Evans Engineering Solutions Communications Consultants 4 <br /> Verizon—Town of Rutland CUP Site Assessment Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.