|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPCUP-2017-02374
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2017
>
DCPCUP-2017-02374
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2017 11:42:09 AM
Creation date
5/9/2017 11:31:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
CUP
Petition Number
02374
Town
Rutland Township
Section Numbers
1
AccelaLink
DCPCUP-2017-02374
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EVANS <br /> ENGINEERING <br /> SOLUTIONS <br /> the 125 people that served on the IEEE committee, 90 came from academic or government <br /> research. Only 16 came from the communications industry. <br /> In 1999, the Environmental Protection Agency expressed the view that "the FCC [RF] exposure <br /> guidelines adequately protect the public from all scientifically established harms that may result <br /> from RF energy fields generated by FCC licensees." <br /> The FCC standards specify a maximum permissible exposure (MPE) level for "uncontrolled" <br /> situations that apply in cases that affect the general public, such as cell towers near schools <br /> and/or residences. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology issued a technical bulletin, <br /> OET Bulletin 65, entitled "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to <br /> Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields" for use in determining whether FCC-licensed <br /> transmitting facilities comply with the MPE levels adopted by the FCC in 1997. All FCC <br /> licensees, which include wireless providers, are required to adhere to these standards. <br /> The proposed site will meet FCC RF exposure requirements with respect to the general <br /> population as long as industry standard practices are followed. Cellular antennas direct 90% or <br /> more of the total RF energy produced in a narrow beam towards the horizon rather than towards <br /> the ground below the antennas. Thus, RF exposure at ground level in areas in the immediate <br /> vicinity would be a small fraction of that which would be observed at the height above ground <br /> where the antenna is mounted. <br /> Accordingly, with the RF energy exposure standards utilized in hundreds of evaluations by this <br /> consultant, and as per previous concurring opinions from the Medical College of Wisconsin', <br /> there is no credible scientific evidence to suggest any public health risks related to RF emissions <br /> from cell towers. <br /> #6 Safety Concerns <br /> The tower structure itself, if properly manufactured and installed, is extremely strong. Credible <br /> scenarios leading to a tower "falling over" are extremely rare. However, in order to address any <br /> remaining concerns, it is suggested that a Wisconsin Registered Professional Engineer not only <br /> approve the tower design (which should take into account accommodation for antenna arrays of <br /> three additional carriers), but inspect it after it is installed. <br /> ' Moulder,John. "Mobile Phone(Cell Phone)Base Stations and Human Health." Medical College of Wisconsin. <br /> Version 8.0.N.p.,3 Apr.2005. Web. 24 July 2013. <br /> <http://www.mcw.eduiradi at iononco logy/ourdepartment/radi ati onb i o logy/Mob i le-Phone-C el l-Phone-B ase-S.htm>. <br /> Evans Engineering Solutions Communications Consultants 5 <br /> Verizon— Town of Rutland CUP Site Assessment Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.