Laserfiche WebLink
Dane County Zoning Ce land Regulation C'mnminee <br />January 18, 2018 <br />Page 5 Plnes Bach LLP <br />Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant considered alternative locations, the <br />applicuntdocs not explain how existing agricultural land within the parcel will he used <br />or the pace at which itwill (w reclaimed, or whether there will he conflicts with scattered <br />nomfm r uses In the area. <br />Combined with the existing 52 -acre nonmetallic mine and concrete batch plans the <br />CUP would leave Cottage Grove with an 87 acre industrial sire in a [oral setting <br />currently characterized by Farms and residences. The applicant here has not <br />demonstrated compliance with Danc Co. Ord. § 10.123(5) and the application should be <br />rejected. <br />C Town orGaragr Grove OunprellmnNM Hon <br />Uader'1'owaof Cottage Greve Ordinance § 15 20.1.2, "la)ny, program of action of the <br />Town Board that affects land use shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan." <br />Although state law does not require a town to make CUP decisions consistent with its <br />comprehensive plan, Cartage Grove has elected to do so through § 15.20.1.2. See also <br />'Town of Cottage Grove Comprehensive Plan, Ch, 3, Fig. I (listing the coniprchensivc <br />plan as a cincument used to review CUP requests). the Plan mfrs that mineral <br />extraction is currently rate in the Town, takingup only 121 arms. (Id., Conditions and <br />lours at 25.) <br />Economic Development Policy H8(b) of the Town of Courage Grove Comprehensive <br />Plan, which pertains in non- metallic mining provides that the Town "will consider all <br />relevant plan policies" and "apply the requirements ofthe'fown Non - Metallic Mining <br />Regulations (Chapter 17 of the Town Code of Ordinances) ... when considering <br />applications for conditional use permit." Furthermore, it states, <br />new extraction uses will not be allowed if they would substantially impair <br />or diminish the value and enjoyment of other property In the area, impede <br />the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding <br />property for rases permitted in vicinity, present a safety hazard, or impair <br />significant or critical wildlife behind. <br />Neither the Town Plan Commission norToven Board even considered the <br />Comprehensive flan to determine whether the proposed CUP would be consistent with <br />it, and the evidence cited show shows it is not. The Dane County Zoning Staff Report <br />inconcrily slates the CUP will be consumnt with the Town plan, without considering <br />the provisions identified above. <br />The proposed CUP worth onto adicl the Town's Comprehensive flan on its face, yet <br />the prantwas never eveu addressed by decision- makers. The application mmtbe denied. <br />