|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPCUP-2017-02405
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2017
>
DCPCUP-2017-02405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2021 3:42:14 PM
Creation date
3/1/2018 10:11:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
CUP
Petition Number
02405
Town
Cottage Grove Township
AccelaLink
DCPCUP-2017-02405
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dane County Zoning&Und Regulation Committee <br />January 19, 2018 <br />Page 6 Pines Bach LLP <br />H. The CUP application process has been precariously flawed. <br />The application and approval proms leading m Zr.R's consideration of this CUP has <br />been flawed and pitmilival to neighbors, and the CUP must be denied as a result. <br />Tire Dane County Circuit Con t recently nded that in oredural protections must be <br />strictly followed in CUP decisions, when it over at reed a quarry CUP in Johnson v. Dona <br />Co. &1. of Supervisors a al, Case No. 14.Cy.2917. There, the Town of Albion rushed <br />through a CUP approval without regard for its own ordinances or procedural rules. The <br />court, slier chastising dm Town for a "confusing, disorganized, and potentially <br />incomplete" record, concluded that early procedural defects had "Frustrated [the <br />neighbore'l right to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meatdmgl'ul way in defense of <br />their own property interests" and "therefore, the later stages of the permitting <br />proms... rely upon and am named by a flawed procedure and evidcnoary recatd." <br />(August 30, 2016 Derision and Order at 10.) It found that County smffcompounded <br />these problems by presenting this Commune and the ZLR with incomplete information <br />as it amnsidered the CUP, and "pr cced[ing) in work towards the mtitnate outcome of <br />molding the form ofappmral, rather than ensuring all parties had received due process." <br />(M. at t2.) <br />This CUP pieces; has suffered multiple procedural uregularitics. <br />PIl'9L the applicant initially and repeatedly tried to have the Town approve its CUP <br />without first applying to the County, as required by Dane County Ord. § 10.255(2)(b) <br />and (c). This proccasbegan in March oF2017, when the liown received a "Notice of <br />Land Use Change." It recommenced in the summer and continued over several Plan <br />Commission meetings until October 25, 2017. when the'rown fiuzlly recognized (at the <br />repeated urging of this firm and school by Oanc County Zoning stall that this process <br />may be defective. (Sea Attachment S at I2 -15.) W Catfdl finally applied with the <br />County on November 9, 2017. By this time, public adention was attenuated and the <br />issue had been confused.2 <br />Scoi tire application is incumpic r, omitted requiring information that would have <br />helped explain this operation's impact on neighbors. For example, the County's <br />ordinances regn ire a detailed operational plan with information such as "anticipated <br />noise, c fors, dust, soot, nmolf or pollution" and measures to mitigate those effects; <br />" the County has utu, not reaivM a fall record. Tw Towertw1ineliegmiv only three pa8es and <br />mfle thermal Plan �and TmvnB rdvacslatctaa .. Howeveadw Town Bouts <br />CJie'v imlinwd [he fat mvrdoFrhisprtrmlwg wuufd extend haskro the adieu application rot <br />the arrcmph. 11c raoN avaJable m tM1e COmmincew fardocsnm rim rhisiufowatiun. <br />Aunchmem3 itMuda Mc vdnmcs afrMsco�tingr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.