DCPCUP-2017-02405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Done County Zoning & Ianti Regulation Committee )anuaryls,2i118 Page 7 Pines Bach MY number ofemployces; and "anticipated daily traffic, types and weights of vehicles" anti any needed road Improvements. Dane County Ord. § 10.255(c)(2). Mr. Cartel's one. page, bullet point "operating plan" omits day information, despite noise and truck traffic being significant issues. It also omits an cxpla nation of how the additional CUP standards fist an AA Rx zoning district in Dane Co. Ord. § 10.123(5) will be satisfied. This information still has not been given to the County or the Town, even though case law mandates that "a court should measure the sugsdency of traditional use application at thesime that notice of the final Public hearing is fast given. Such a rule ensures that interested individuals will have a meaningful opportunity to express informed opinions at the public hearings." Wirin a Tawn of ninkviffe, 209 Wis. 2d 214, 237 38, 562 N.W.2d 412,421 (1997) (emphasis added). 'Third, notice of the Town Plan Commission and'I Own th ardmeetings where the CUP would be considered we%exceedingly short, furdsr impacting public notice and comment oppimun itics. The County received the application November 9, 2017, and the Town Plan Commission considered it less than a week Inner, on November 15, 2017. The Town Hoard meeting was December 4,2017. Pubticinticeofthese meetings was generally only provided a kw days in advance, and they were not clearly noticed as public hearings where residents could provide input (Set, Attachment 3 at 1, 69, 11.) Fourth, the Tukiendort's have not been fairly involved in [he ferrets, For example, we only learned drought an Open Rccerds icquesl in November that Dane County Zoning Administrator Roger rant had written a letter to the Town months before, on August 28, dismissing Mr. Tukiendorfs concerns about the existing pit and concrete plant and implying that he is the only person who has complained. We then responded to Mr. Lane and to Dane County Assistant Corporation Counsel David Gault refining these marathons, which still not been completely resolved (&e AnachmeartM1J Regardless, the corespondenm directly firm the County to the Town was highly prejudicial for the CUP process and unfair to Mr. Tuklendorf, in addition to being untme for the reasons explained in Attachments 1 and 4lower. These procedural defect have improperly affecmd the process surrounding [his CUP, and the Committee should not approve it IN. Compliance and oversight issues of the existing operations further show that the CUP should not he granted and will not be enhanced effectively. The applicant's track record with the existing mine and mnaete batch plant have worsened the existing pmica's impacts and raise serious concerns that the applicant will not comply with this CLIP if granted.