Laserfiche WebLink
10.193(4)— 10.194(5) <br /> (4) Sub. (3)(e) shall not be construed to existing communication tower are unreasonable <br /> require a sign or to require any designation of relative to industry norms; or <br /> the business as an adult book store, whether or (f) The applicant demonstrates that there are <br /> not a sign is erected. other factors that render existing communication <br /> [History: 10.193 cr., OA 16, 1993-94, pub. 12/27/93; (3)(d) towers unsuitable or unavailable and establishes <br /> am.,OA 16,1996-97,pub.01/16/97;(3)am.,OA 3, 1998-99, that the public interest is best served by the <br /> pub.09/24/98.] <br /> placement or construction of a new <br /> 10.194 PROCEDURE AND STANDARDS FOR communication tower. <br /> THE PLACEMENT, CONSTRUCTION OR (3) The cost of eliminating impediments to <br /> MODIFICATION OF COMMUNICATION collocation shall be deemed reasonable if it does <br /> TOWERS. This section provides the procedures not exceed by 25 percent the cost of <br /> and standards for issuance of conditional use constructing a new tower on which to mount <br /> permits for the placement, construction or applicant's equipment. <br /> modification of communication towers as defined (4) In the event the committee determines that <br /> in section 10.01(78m). it is necessary to consult with a third party in <br /> (1). It is intended that conditional use permits considering the factors listed in subsection (2) <br /> shall be issued under this section to above, all reasonable costs and expenses <br /> accommodate the expansion of wireless associated with such consultation shall be borne <br /> communication technology while minimizing the by the applicant. Failure to pay such costs and <br /> number of tower sites through the requirement expenses or provide information requested by <br /> that permitted towers be placed or constructed the committee shall be grounds for denial or <br /> so that they may be utilized for the collocation of revocation of a conditional use permit. The <br /> antenna arrays to the extent technologically and applicant may provide to the committee the <br /> economically feasible. names of consultants which the applicant <br /> (2) No conditional use permit for the believes are qualified to assist in resolving the <br /> placement or construction of a tower shall be issues before the committee. <br /> issued unless the applicant presents to the (5) In applying the standards and criteria set <br /> committee credible evidence establishing to a forth in section 10.255(2), D. C. Ords., to <br /> reasonable degree of certainty the following: applications for conditional use permits for the <br /> (a) No existing communication tower is located placement or construction of a communication <br /> within the area in which the applicant's tower the committee shall, unless it is shown to <br /> equipment must be located; or be unreasonable, condition the grant of the <br /> (b) No existing communication tower within the permit upon the applicant placing or constructing <br /> area in which the applicant's equipment must be the communication tower so as to accommodate, <br /> located is of sufficient height to meet applicant's at a minimum height of 150 feet, the collocation <br /> • requirements and the deficiency in height cannot of two additional antenna arrays similar in size <br /> be remedied at a reasonable cost; or and function to that placed on the tower by the <br /> (c) No existing communication tower within the applicant. Collocation. sites need not be <br /> area in which the applicant's equipment must be available on the tower as initially placed or <br /> located has sufficient structural strength to constructed, provided that the tower will support <br /> at the specified applicant's equipment and the deficiency fied minimum height the later addition <br /> in structural strength cannot be remedied at a of the required number of collocation sites. <br /> reasonable cost; or Notwithstanding the height and number of <br /> (d) The applicant's equipment would cause collocation sites on the tower as initially placed <br /> electromagnetic interference with equipment on or constructed, the communication tower design <br /> the existing communication tower(s) within the approved and permitted under this ordinance <br /> area in which the applicant's equipment must be shall be for a tower of 150 feet in height and <br /> located, or the equipment on the existing shall include the required collocation sites. The <br /> communication tower(s) would cause holder of a permit under this section shall make <br /> interference with the applicant's equipment and the collocation sites required hereunder available <br /> the interference, from whatever source, cannot for the placement of technologically compatible <br /> be eliminated at a reasonable cost; or antenna arrays and equipment upon contractual <br /> (e) The fees, costs or contractual provisions provisions which are standard in the industry and <br /> required by the owner in order to collocate on an at prevailing market rates allowing the permit <br /> holder to recoup the cost of providing the <br /> collocation sites and a fair return on investment. <br /> Page 10-56 <br /> rev. 073113 <br />