Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br /> • 1750 Skidmore Road <br /> • Stoughton,WI 53589 <br /> • <br /> Hm 608/873 6777 <br /> • Off 608/266-7185 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> June 23, 1998 <br /> To: Members, Dane County Zoning Committee <br /> From: Stephen W. Grohmann - "/ <br /> Town of Pleasant Springs <br /> Subject: Zoning Petition#7271 <br /> I urge you to swiftly and decisively reject Zoning Petition#7271. The Deed Restriction you are <br /> being asked to remove is a well considered and debated resolution to a long standing problem. It <br /> codifies an agreement reached between Milwaukee Repeater, the Town of Pleasant Springs, and <br /> myself a year a half ago after a lot of discussion with all the parties. <br /> The previous access road to the tower site in question is an old farm road running through my <br /> yard at 1750 Skidmore Road. It is a 10 foot wide easement that runs between my house and <br /> outbuildings. It was assigned almost 50 years ago when (I am told) the tower site only needed to <br /> be checked a couple times a year Over the 10 years I have lived there, I have seen increasing <br /> traffic by tenants of the tower, at all hours of the day and night. <br /> In Fall of 1996, Milwaukee Repeater requested a zoning change to build an newer tower with <br /> even more capacity. Upon understanding the obsolete nature of the existing easement for the <br /> intended use, the Town of Pleasant Springs Board required that a new easement be developed by <br /> Milwaukee Repeater and use of the old one be discontinued. The Town asked that the new <br /> easement be developed before construction of the new tower(see attached letter from Town <br /> Chairman Ken Schuck to Milwaukee Repeater). Milwaukee Repeater stressed the importance of <br /> beginning construction as soon as possible and asked to use the old easement during the <br /> construction period and develop the new access over the ensuing months. Largely because I <br /> agreed to this process, the Town altered its requirement to require, instead, that the new easement <br /> be developed within one year of the CUP issuance. Representatives of Milwaukee Repeater <br /> stated their complete agreement with this resolution (reiterated in the Ken Schuck letter <br /> attached). <br /> The Deed Restriction that codified this agreement was endorsed by the County Zoning <br /> Committee and County Board. This resolution was recognized by all parties as a firm and <br /> permanent solution. The Deed Restriction is not ambiguous. Milwaukee Repeater was required <br /> to secure a new access and develop it for use within the one year grace period granted. <br /> )43-- CR4 i <br />