Laserfiche WebLink
2.1 FACILITIES LOCATED IN AN OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREA <br /> In order to identify the possibility of the facility to be located in a designed wilderness <br /> area,the following steps were taken by Edge Consulting: <br /> 1.) Readily available information was reviewed from the National Park Service(NPS) <br /> for the area around the project. The site is not located within any national parks or <br /> nationally designated wilderness areas. <br /> 2.) Readily available information was reviewed from the Wisconsin Department of <br /> Natural Resources(WDNR)for the area around the project. No state designated <br /> parks,trails or forests were identified within the proposed project area. <br /> It is the opinion of Edge Consulting that this project is not located in an officially <br /> designated wilderness area. <br /> 2.2 FACILITIES LOCATED IN A DESIGNATED WILDERNESS PRESERVE <br /> Edge Consulting utilized the same documentation process described above,under <br /> Wilderness Area,to determine if the site is located in a designated wilderness preserve. <br /> It is the opinion of Edge Consulting that this project is not located in a designated <br /> wilderness preserve. <br /> 2.3 FACILITIES WHICH MAY AFFECT THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES OR DESIGNATED <br /> CRITICAL HABITATS;OR ARE LIKELY TO JEOPARDIZE THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF ANY <br /> PROPOSED ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR LIKELY TO RESULT IN THE DESTRUCTION OR <br /> ADVERSE MODIFICATION OF PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITATS,AS DETERMINED BY THE SECRETARY <br /> OF THE INTERIOR PURSUANT TO THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973 <br /> To identify the potential for the facility to affect threatened or endangered species or <br /> designated critical habitats, Edge Consulting took the following steps: <br /> 1.) Initially, Edge Consulting determined the proposed project would have No Effect <br /> on federally-listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat. <br /> Correspondence with the United States Department of Interior,Fish&Wildlife <br /> Service(FWS)was not required by FWS policy for No Effect determinations. Since <br /> 2011,towers with guy wires are required to be submitted for review. On November <br /> 13,2013,a letter was submitted for review. The US FWS response stated,"Due to <br /> the project location,we concur with your determination that no federal-listed, <br /> proposed,or candidate species would be expected with the project area. No <br /> critical habitat is present. This precludes the need for further action on this project <br /> as required by the 1973 Endangered Species Act,as amended." The letter also <br /> asked to be contacted if the tower could not be lowered to less than 200 feet. <br /> Edge Consulting submitted a follow up letter dated December 9,2013,indicating <br /> a reduction in tower height not being possible. A copy of this documentation is <br /> included in Appendix B. Although not specifically required by state or federal <br /> endangered species laws,to reduce the risk of tower to migratory birds, it is <br /> recommended that all newly constructed towers should conform to the USFWS <br /> Guidelines found at <br /> http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.html <br /> 5080 NEPA-Update -2- <br />