|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-2014-10672
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
2010s
>
2014
>
DCPREZ-2014-10672
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 11:38:35 AM
Creation date
10/28/2015 9:59:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
10672
Town
Rutland Township
Section Numbers
34
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-2014-10672
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Standard Information to help you better understand this ER Review <br /> Endangered Resources(ER)Reviews are conducted using a standard six-step process in which we gather initial <br /> information about the project and site,determine if endangered resources are present or likely to be present on the site, <br /> determine if the proposed project is likely to affect endangered resources present on site,determine if potential impacts to <br /> endangered resources present on the site can be avoided,identify options for proceeding if impacts to endangered <br /> resources cannot be avoided,and confirm and document findings. <br /> To determine what endangered resources are present or likely to be present on the site,we first query the Wisconsin <br /> Natural Heritage Inventory(NHI)database for endangered resources records for the proposed project area.The project area <br /> evaluated consists of both the specific project site and a buffer area surrounding the site.The size of the buffer considered <br /> varies depending on the size and nature of the project and the ecological and land use characteristics of the site and <br /> surrounding area.In all cases,at least a 1-mile buffer is considered.At least a 2 mile buffer is considered for large linear <br /> projects,projects in areas that are unlikely to have been surveyed(e.g.,within large blocks of private land),and projects <br /> near wetlands and waterbodies.Other circumstances may warrant use of a larger buffer.For example,for projects in a large <br /> patch of contiguous habitat,we look throughout the patch.Endangered resources records from the buffer area are <br /> considered because most lands and waters in the state,especially private lands,have not been surveyed. <br /> In addition,If the area has moderate to high-quality or extensive habitat or if we are aware that recent surveys have been <br /> conducted on or near the site,we consult additional online databases,species experts,or other sources of endangered <br /> resources information to complement information contained in the NHI database.Considering records from the entire project <br /> area(also sometimes referred to as the search area)as well as other endangered resources information and data whenever <br /> warranted provides the best picture of species and communities that may be present on your specific site if suitable habitat <br /> for those species or communities is present. <br /> This ER Review is being provided to you as a tool to help you comply with state and federal endangered species laws.By <br /> following the process described above,we have provided you with the best information currently available about <br /> endangered resources that may be present in the proposed project area.However,endangered resources information is <br /> never perfect.The NHI database is not all inclusive;systematic surveys of most public lands have not been conducted,and <br /> the majority of private lands have not been surveyed.Occurrences of endangered resources are only in the NHI database if <br /> the site has been previously surveyed for that species or group during the appropriate season,and an observation was <br /> reported to and entered into the NHI database.As such,absence of a record in the NHI database for a specific area should <br /> not be used to infer that no endangered resources are present in that area.Similarly,the presence of one species does not <br /> imply that surveys have been conducted for other species.Evaluations of the possible presence of rare species on the <br /> project site should always be based on whether suitable habitat exists on site for that species. <br /> Endangered resources considered in ER Reviews and protections for each: <br /> Species listed as Threatened or Endangered under Wisconsin's Endangered Species Law(s.29.604,Wis.Stats.): <br /> • State-listed animals(vertebrate and invertebrate)are protected on all lands and waters of the state <br /> • State-listed plants are protected on public lands and on lands that the person does not own or lease,except in the <br /> course of forestry,agriculture or utility actions(s.29.604,Wis.Stats.). <br /> Species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended,including those federally-listed as <br /> Endangered or Threatened,those Proposed or Candidates for federal listing,and their Proposed or Designated Critical <br /> habitats: <br /> • Federally-protected animals are protected on all lands. <br /> • Federally-protected plants are protected on federal lands and in the course of projects that include federal funding. <br /> They are also protected on other lands if they are removed,cut,dug up or damaged in knowing violation of any law <br /> or regulation of any state or in violation of a criminal trespass law. <br /> Special Concern species,high-quality examples of natural communities(sometimes called High Conservation Value areas), <br /> and unique natural features(e.g.,caves and animal aggregation sites)are not legally protected by state or federal <br /> endangered species laws.However,other laws,policies(e.g.,related to Forest Certification or master planning),or <br /> granting/permitting processes may require or strongly encourage protection of these resources.The main purpose of the <br /> Special Concem classification is to focus attention on species about which some problem of abundance or distribution is <br /> suspected before they become endangered or threatened. <br /> State Natural Areas(SNAs)protect outstanding examples of Wisconsin's native landscape of natural communities,and <br /> significant geological formations.Endangered species are often found within SNAs.SNAs are protected by law from any use <br /> that is inconsistent with or injurious to their natural values(s.23.28.Wis.Stats.). <br /> Please click on hvperlinks for more information <br /> ER Review Log# 10-341 Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.