Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 54 accidents including a fatality have occurred at this <br /> intersection in the last year. <br /> The increased traffic will discourage commuter <br /> traffic <br /> thereby impacting my business. <br /> The loads of clay will inevitably create dust on the <br /> highway which will blow over my property and buildings. <br /> The noise will adversely affect customers making <br /> purchases. This project will destroy the scenic beauty <br /> of the area. <br /> Approval may cause me to locate my business elsewhere <br /> causing a loss to me, the community, and my customers. <br /> The reduced value of my land would make it less <br /> marketable and would limit the types of business that <br /> would locate ,there. <br /> The Town Land Use Plan Mineral Extraction Policies <br /> 3 . a & b. is violated by this proposal . <br /> Jim Spencer 2407 Hwy 12 & 18 my property borders the land in <br /> question1320 feet along one side. <br /> my big worry is that I train and show horses and the <br /> excess noise and commotion will interfere with the <br /> operations. <br /> I bought the land 3 1/2 years ago and was never told <br /> of the possibility of this proposal . <br /> I 'm also concerned over water quality as we have family <br /> health problems . <br /> Eugene Skaar 2376 Hwy MN <br /> The Town has successfully kept much of the property <br /> clear of residential growth. This proposal seems <br /> like another foot in the door.We have tried to keep it <br /> in agriculture and this certainly is not going to keep <br /> it in agriculture. If they take the clay out, it will <br /> never be agriculture as we know it. <br /> Talk about the amount they will take off, there is <br /> going to be a lake down there with no place to drain <br /> it . Its going to have to be pumped to get it out of <br /> there. If it does drain, its going to affect the water <br /> quality of any wells that are deeper than that water. <br /> When that water is there its either going to have to <br /> seep into the ground or evaporate . <br /> Kris Hampton I object to the expansion to the full 77 acres <br /> I am concerned about the adding the southern portion. <br /> It means taking so much more land with so little more <br /> clay to show for it. I could accept the northern <br /> portion under the restrictions we used at that time. <br /> I am concerned that the extraction will be above the <br /> water table so the water would drain and there would <br /> be no sedimentation basin there . <br /> Response: <br /> "Es <br />