Laserfiche WebLink
• m. <br /> BOARDMAN, SUHR, CURRY & FIELD <br /> Lyman F. Anderson, Chairman <br /> August 20, 1993 • <br /> Page 2 <br /> 2 . A town "mobile home ordinance" can be more restrictive <br /> than county zoning ordinances only as to mobile home parks, not <br /> as to individual mobile homes. See the last sentence of Wis. <br /> Stat. S66. 058 (2) (c) . <br /> 3. A local government ordinance on mobile homes that <br /> prohibits mobile homes outside of mobile home parks had been <br /> ruled illegal. Separate correspondence from the Wisconsin <br /> Manufactured Housing Association addressed to your Committee in <br /> the file of this conditional use application will identify and <br /> discuss relevant court rulings. <br /> 4. To force investment in a permanent building for this <br /> use will contradict the direction of the Dane County Green Space <br /> and the Dane County Park and Open Space Plans that were adopted <br /> in Resolution 91, adopted October 17, 1991, and Resolution No. <br /> 90, adopted December 12, 1991, respectively, since a requirement <br /> to build a permanent structure will increase costs to the county <br /> taxpayers if and when the property is acquired for permanent <br /> public open space, as called for in these two county board- <br /> adopted plans. <br /> The aerial photograph that I displayed during the public <br /> hearing has been submitted to the Dane County Zoning Office as <br /> part of the permanent file on this application. <br /> Again, we urge you to support the conditional use applica- <br /> tion for the caretaker's quarters as proposed by the applicant. <br /> Sincerel • •ur , <br /> BOARD i� ' /° ' , . ' & FIELD <br /> I • <br /> Richard A. Lehmann <br /> RAL:hr <br /> cc: Clients <br /> Supervisor David Ripp <br /> RAL\I TR AND&816.RUS <br />