1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - PAGE 6 CONCLUSION: a. variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. b. variance is necessary to`provide right enjoyed by others. c. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried. #472. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant variance of 7 feet from required setback from center of Burve Road as per finding of fact: 1. residence will be built on old foundation of burned out resi- dence in order to utilize existing walls; septic and well locations. 2. Burve Road is a dead-end road, low traffic volume and is straight at this location. CONCLUSION: a. variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. b. variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried. #473. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to hold in abeyance for further study; determination to be made no later than June 25, 1976. Motion carried. #474. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to hold in abeyance, for further study; determination to be made no later than June 25, 1976. Motion carried. #475. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant 31 foot variance from required setback from normal high water line as per finding of fact: 1. Existing residence was built previous to the ordinance re- quiring 75 foot setback from water. a. hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed. b. variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. c. variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. d. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. #476. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to deny appeal as per finding of fact: 1. zoning ordinance requirement of a minimum of 5 acres, 250 foot lot width for A-1 use; keeping of livestock, has been in effect since 1950. C