1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - MINUTES - PAGE 2 7-,,,-t JF /,-/9-74' IN FAVOR: Mrs. Steve Tracy - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Chairman telephoned opposition. Dane County Highway Department: Letter not in favor of present location. #538. Appeal by Nancy J. Johnson for a variance from required side yard s as provided by Section 10.07 (6) (a) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit a garage addition to a residence lo- . cated on Lot #6 and the East 20 feet of Lot #5, Colladay Point Section 23, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: Russell Rorge representing Miss Johnson - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Not present. #539. Appeal by Scott and Duane Miller for a variance from vision clearance as provided by Section 10.4.3 (1) (c) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit an on premise sign in part of the SE 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 6, Town of Oregon. IN FAVOR: Scott Miller - OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Not present. #540. Appeal by the Windsor Skelly Truck Stop for a variance from re- quired setback from U.S.H. 51 as provided by Section 10.17 (1) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit location of a modular building unit in part of the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of Section 5, Town of Burke. IN FAVOR: Jack McClain - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Not present. #541. Appeal by Stainless Tank and Equipment Company for a variance from required setback from the right-of-way of C.T.H. TT as provided by Section 10.17 (2) Dane County Zoning Ordinance. Variance is necessary to permit construction of a storage warehouse in part of the S 1/2 SE 1/4 of Section 33, Town of Sun Prairie. IN FAVOR: Alex Falk - OPPOSED: None - TOWN BOARD: Not present - Dane County Highway Department: Letter - not opposed. The public hearing was closed. #532 . Motion by Voges, second by Dahlk to grant a variance of 9 feet from rear yard requirement as per finding of fact: 1. House was built by others with greater set-hack than required, thereby reducing rear yard area. 2. Enclosure is needed to prevent wind and rain from coming in back door. CONCLUSION: a. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. h. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried.