Laserfiche WebLink
• -3- 10/17/75 <br /> Minutes of Board of Adjustment <br /> #395. Motion by Dahlk, second by Voges to grant a 42' variance from <br /> S- shoreline setback as per finding of fact. <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to shoreline setback <br /> 2. Addition is on side of residence away from shore. <br /> 3. Addition is needed for more living space. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> A. Unecessary hardship <br /> B. Ordinance preserved as far as possible without injustice to <br /> individual <br /> C. Variance is necessary to obtain rights enjoyed by others. <br /> Notion carried. <br /> #396. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant a 31' variance from <br /> required setback from centerline of highway as per finding of fact. <br /> 1. Existing residence is non-conforming as to setback <br /> 2. Additions will be on rear of house. <br /> 3. Highway is straight with no vision problems. <br /> 1&. Other yards are conforming. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> A. Unecessary hardship <br /> B. Ordinance preserved as far as possible without injustice to <br /> individual. <br /> C. Variance is necessary to obtain rights enjoyed by others. <br /> D. Motion contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #397. Notion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant 40' variance from <br /> required setback as per finding of fact: <br /> 1. Existing house is non-conforming. <br /> 2. Additions will be on sides of house. <br /> 3. Highway is straight with no vision problem. <br /> 4. Other yards are conforming. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> A. unecessary hardship. <br /> B. Ordinance is preserved as far as possible without injury to <br /> individual. <br /> C. Variance is necessary to obtain rights enjoyed by others. <br /> D. Motion contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> #398. Motion Voges second by Dahlk to grant a 2' variance from required <br /> side yard as per finding of fact: <br /> 1. Slope of lot creates driveway problem. <br /> 2. Construction of roofs, existing porch and new garage, create <br /> problem of gutter installation. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> A. Unecessary hardship. <br /> B. Motion contrary to public interest or rights of others. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> #399. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant a Special Exception <br /> Permit to grade and fill as requested. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 011-.( <br />