DCPREZ-0000-05557 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- 3 - P. Anderson was sent to the Heinemann property on 3/8/93. A copy of his Inspection Report is attached. While the Inspection Report addresses itself primarily to the physical presence of commercial work-related raw materials and equipment, it is obvious that Inspector Anderson was not present during the early morning rush of activities. Surprisingly, Inspector Anderson did ascertain that the adjacent build- ing constructed in 1984, was constructed without obtaining a Building Permit. t the Town Board (Board) meeting of 3/8/93 , Mr. Heinemann admitted that he was "guilty" of carrying on commercial work-related activities at his residential property since 1986. 3. Mr. Heinemann also stated in his 2/9/93 Committee rebuttal state- ment, after the matter of an attempt by the Heinemanns to build Mini Ware- houses in the area had been mentioned earlier , that Mini Warehouses were being considered as a construction project a few years earlier, but after "discussions with our neighbors, the idea was dropped". That was also an untrue statement. As in the case of Petition #5557, no neighbors were ever consulted or even informed of the planned Mini Warehouse venture . The truth is that the Heinemanns were attempting to purchase land from John Dushack, 4846 Cty Trk N, Town of Sun Prairie , for the specific purpose of building Mini Warehouses. Only when I:1r . Dushack refused to sell the land for that s secif is purpose was the idea dropped. Mr . Dush Eck' s widow, =linor Dushack, of the same address, can and will substantiate the above for the Committee , if requested to do so. 4. Since the Heinemann home was constructed in 1984, some 15 to 18 other homes have been constructed in the immediate one-half mile arecof the Heinemann property. This accelerated residential construction, which is cur- rently in full swing, has not created any problems since we live in a rural residential area undergoing rapid development. Nearly all newly constructed homes were required by the Dane County Highway & Transportation Department to have large culvert pipes installed as part of their driveway construc- tion to allow for normal water drainage in the roadside ditches. Of all these residences, only the Heinemann driveway entrance has had the culvert drainage pipe filled in with soil and relandscaped to prevent water drain- age, as prescribed by the Highway Department. Mr. Steve Haag of the Highway Department Road Maintenance Section states that it is illegal to block a culvert pipe and hinder roadside drainage . I have drawn attention to the above four items to correct an impression that Er. Heinemann may have conveyed to the Committee on 2/9/93 , and to demonstrate what appears to me to be: a. A total disregard to abide by the regulations and laws of the Dane County Government ; b. A lack of respect for the Committee and the neighbors within the community in which the Heinemanns reside ; and c. A total disregard of the truth as it pertains to the verbal application details of petition #5557. On 2/9/93, a petition signed by 30 neighborhood property owner house- holds was submitted to the Committee objecting to the rezoning requests contained in petition #5557. Since that time, four additional households