1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - Minutes July 15, 1977 PAGE 3 Applicant did not appear. OTHERS IN FAVOR: None OPPOSED: None 460 TOWN BOARD: Phillip Esser (phone call) - no objection. #588. Appeal by Richard Fisher for a special exception permit, as pro- vided by Section 10.33 (c) (2) Dane County Zoning Ordinance, to construe a residential garage and add a deck to a residence on property located in a flood plain area in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 Section 23, Town of Mazomanie. IN FAVOR: R. Fisher OTHERS IN FAVOR: None OPPOSED: None TOWN BOARD: Not present. DNR - no communication. The public hearing was closed. #577. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant a 5 foot variance from required right side yard as per finding of fact. 1. Required location of well, septic and house and area of bed- rock make it impossible to locate pool in any other location. CONCLUSION: a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. d. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self- imposed. C; #578. Motion by Dahlk second by Voges to grant variance of 8 feet required rear yard as per finding of fact: 1. Existing residence is non-conforming. No addition could be built on rear side without a variance. CONCLUSION: a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed others. c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried. #579. Motion by Voges second by Dahlk to grant a 2 foot variance from left side yard for addition to residence and a 5 foot variance from left side yard for addition to garage as per finding of fact: 1. Pie shape of lot with rear width being less than front width, create problem. 2. Lots on either side because their consistant width is less than 60 feet need only a total of 15 feet fro side yard with mini- mum of 5 feet on one side. This lot with 53 feet rear and 83 feet front averages 68 feet width requiring 10 feet each side. 3. Existing garage is non-conforming in location. CONCLUSION: Cr, a. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. b. Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. c. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. d. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self-imposed.