1977 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT = Minutes March 18, 1977 Page 2 Grove. 4i,':' . IN FAVOR: L. Daugherty. (;THERS IN FAVOR: none. OPPOSED:1; none. TUIiI`J BOARD: not present. Communication: Dane Co. Highway; no objection, The Public Hearing was closed. #553. Motion by Voges, second by Dahlk to grant the Special Exception Permit to grade and fill as specified in application: 1. no major filling; back-fill for basement and filling of a 6 ft. by 30 ft. rutted, eroded area. 2. spreading, leveling of black dirt, "top-soil" to a depth of 2 to 3 inches. 3. entire area will be seeded to prevent erosion or siltation. Motion carried. #554. Motion by Dahlk, second by Voges, to grant withdrawal of appeal. Motion carried. : 555. Motion .by Dahlk, second by Voges, to grant a variance of 3 feet from required setback from Seybold Road as per finding of fact: 1. Seybold Road is only a 60 foot R.O,W, . Therefore, as per Sec. 10.17 (3)(b) a 63 foot setback is required from the center-line of the road. This requires a 33 foot setback from the front prop- erty linewhereas on a regular 66 foot R.O.W. the 63 foot from center-line would be only 30 feet from the front property line. 2. addition to the rear or side would be impossible as these areas are required for driveway, loading area and parking. CONCLUSION A. Proven case of unnecessary hardship. B. Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible with- out injustice to the individual. C. Hardship is caused by the ordinance and is not self imposed. Motion carried. 6556. Motion by Voges, second by Dahlk, to grant a variance to permit the proposed accessory building to be 880 sq. ft. larger than than the 864 sq. ft. maximum allowed by the zoning ordinance, and a variance of 3 feet from height restrictions as per finding of fact: 1. existing residence does not have an attached garage. 2. any size garage addition, subject only to lot coverage require- ment, could be added to the residence. 3. seperate building is proposed because of height requirement for motor home which must have a 12 ft. high door. CONCLUSION. A. Variance is required to provide a right enjoyed by others. B. Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to public interest Motion carried. #557. Motion by Dahlk, second by Voges, to deny; 1. proposed garage is located on a vacant lot - no topographical or C other problems. 2. Town is opposed to the variance. . - Motion carried. • •