|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-05228
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-05228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 3:40:23 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 3:40:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
05228
Town
Cross Plains Township
Section Numbers
14
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-05228
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> JAMES M. WILKIE, M.D. <br /> 8075 Old Sauk Pass <br /> Cross Plains, Wisconsin 53528 <br /> 608-831-5410 <br /> Page Two <br /> We are not able to earn sufficient rental from the entire farm <br /> to pay the taxes . This should tell you something about the <br /> problems relative to the small acreage being offered for sale . <br /> My wife and myself are both 77 years old and are in need of <br /> selling some parcels of land from the farm for economic <br /> reasons . We look forward to disposing of our property in such <br /> a way as to preserve the agricultural croplands , but we have to <br /> realize that the farm itself is not a viable agriculture <br /> venture . During the past year I received only $1 , 550 in rental <br /> for the entire cropland , including the parcel being offered for <br /> sale . <br /> The parcel being offered for sale includes 11 . 5 acres of <br /> farmland listed as cropland . Of this 10 acres is good or very <br /> good land , although I would hesitate to classify it as prime <br /> because it is classified as wetland by the Soil Conservation <br /> Service . In fact , they were not willing to accept it for <br /> C.R.P. purposes during the past year because of this . The <br /> eastern portion of the parcel consists entirely of woodland and <br /> some open or relatively open waste land at the bottom of the <br /> hill adjacent to and east of the field I have just described . <br /> This is the area where the buyer intended to put a house that <br /> would be reached by the normal lane that we used for <br /> agricultural access along the northern fence line . This would <br /> not encroach in any way on the field itself . <br /> The buyer has indicated his desire to continue the land in <br /> agriculture use and the tenant who has been working the land is <br /> agreeable to continuing to use the land for agriculture <br /> purposes as the rate of $50 per acre . I am not sure how many <br /> years he will be willing to continue to do this , although I <br /> suspect we will be able to get someone to do the agricultural <br /> work in the foreseeable future . It should be pointed out <br /> though, that the land is hardly economically viable when you <br /> consider the rental we have been getting and the small area of <br /> the field . My estimation is the chances of continuing the land <br /> in agricultural operation for the foreseeable future would be <br /> better in the hands of the prospective buyer than it would be <br /> if the land remains in our own hands because the prospective <br /> buyer has agreed to keep the land in agricultural use and to <br /> not encroach on the field from the standpoint of any house that <br /> he would build on the property . In this connection he <br /> indicates that a house , if built , would be built against the <br /> hillside where there would be no significant encroachment on <br /> the cropland . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.