1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA MINUTES/9/27/90 Page 9 FINDING OF FACT: 1). 7' x 10.5' game room and 10' x 16' second story entry constructed without permits (10' x 16' addition since removed now wishes re-instated). 2). Applicant has withdrawn requested variance to rear of building. 3). Parking provided by lot across street. 4). Town Chairman spoke in favor of requested variance. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0. #2007. Manchester/Dunn - 7/26/90 P.H. IN FAVOR: J. Manchester, J. Hay-Chapman, A. Robertson OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: ---. Quackenbush/Rendall to deny requested variances from required setback to normal high watermark to permit screen porch addition and to left sideyard (East) for residential addition. Motion carried - 4-0. Quackenbush/Harvey to grant variance of 6 feet to required right sideyard (West) to permit bay window an step to infringe upon said sideyard. Motion carried - 3-0. Rendall, absent. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Applicant proposes to virtually construct new residence and yet incorporate old structure into design. 2). Applicant has withdrawn requested variance from maximum allowable percent of lot coverage. 3). With new construction there is the ability to, with structural modifications, achieve complying location. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. (re: minimal sideyard instrusion). 2). Unnecessary hardship was not proven. (re: balance of requested items). #2012. Householder/Westport - 7/26/90 P.H. IN FAVOR: B. Quamme, J. Householder OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Quackenbush/Harvey to amend Special Exception Permit request with conditions from earlier grant (7/26/90) to provide for relocated structure and re-design of residence. CONDITIONS: 1). Approval subject to plan submitted by D'Onofrio and Kottke Engineering - (plan dated "9/25/90"). 2). That plans and specifications be prepared by a licensed engineer within the scope of the application, and filed with the Zoning Department before commencement of any work. 3). That all work be performed in compliance with approved engineering standards and all applicable governmental rules and regulations particularly Section 11.05(4) of Dane County Ordinance.