1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

411/ B.O.A. Minutes/4/26/90 Page 2 #1965. Appeal by Woodard & Marilyn Knox for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark as provided by Section 11.03(2) to permit addition to existing residence also for a special exception permit as provided by Section 11.05 (3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet of Lake Kegonsa at 2288 CTH AB being Lot #5, Colladay Park - Section 23, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: W. Knox OPPOSED: N. Larson, D. Crane COMMUNICATION: Co. Hwy. , D.N.R. , Kegonsa Sanitary District. #1966. Appeal by Maurice & Thomas Lacey for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17 (3) to permit storage building as constructed across from 1989 Skyline Drive in the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 29, Town of Pleasant Springs. IN FAVOR: No appearances OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: ---. #1967. Appeal by Donald B. Johnson for a variance from required sideyard and addition to nonconforming structure as provided by Sections 10.07 (7) and 10.23 (2) to permit addition to existing residence at 1956 Quam Point Drive #1968. Appeal by Skipper Marine of Madison for a special exception permit as provided by Section 11.05 (3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet of Yahara River in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 - Section 22, Town of Westport. IN FAVOR: D. Johnson OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: ---. #1968. Appeal by Skipper Marine of Madison fora special exception permit as provided by Section 11.05 (3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet of Yahara River in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 - Section 22, Town of Westport. IN FAVOR: F. Christianson OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board, Co. Hwy. Board rendered the following decisions: #1960. Robar - Dunn. Quackenbush/Harvey to grant, with conditions, variance of 18 more or less feet from required setback to normal high watermark of LaW1Kegonsa to permit deck replacement to existing residence. CONDITIONS: 1) . Deck will extend no closer to normal high watermark than did previous deck which was in need of repair. 2) . Utmost care taken to maintain safety of tree intended to be incorporated into deck design. FINDING OF FACT: 1) . Deck will extend 20 feet from residence same as former deck removed due to rotting. 2) . Shoreland juts sharply inward at applicant's lot. 3) . Deck will not become screened porch without additional variance. CONCLUSION: 1) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. fir' 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 4-0.