1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

thy BOA 3/22/90/Minutess Page 2 #1956. Appeal by Louis Klecker for a variance from required setback from road as provided by Section 10.17(3) to permit addition to accessory building at 5565 Boxelder Road in the SE 1 /4 SW 1 /4 - Section 14 , Town of Medina. IN FAVOR: L . Klecker, Tony Laufenberg OPPOSED: none TOWN: no communication #1957. Appeal by Doug Stolen, agent for Frank Nichols for a variance from required setback to normal high watermark as provided by Section 11 .03(2 ) (a ) to permit residential addition at 2285 Williams Point Drive being Lots 32, 33 & 34 Williams Point - Section 19 , Town of Pleasant Springs. Applicant withdrew the application, construction was revised and a variance is not necessary. #1958. Appeal by Charles A. Burch II for a variance from required sideyards as provided by Section 10.16(5) (a )1 . to permit residence as constructed at 3071-A Sunnyside Street being Lot #7 and the Northwesterly 5 .00 feet of Lot #8, Block #2, Addition to Lee 's Park - Section 18, Town of Pleasant Springs. Cr' IN FAVOR: C. Burch 11 OPPOSED: none TOWN: no communication #1959. Appeal by Gary & Elizabeth Brown for a variance from required setback from normal high watermark as provided by Section 11 .03(2) to permit addition to and alteration of existing residence at 4378 Jordan Drive #13 in the NW 1 /4 NW 1 /4 - Section 17 , Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: G. Brown OPPOSED: none TOWN: in favor THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED and the Board rendered the following decisions: #1951 . Harvey/Quackenbush approve variance of 0.96 ft. from the required setback from Forest Park Drive; FINDING OF FACT: 1 . encroachment into setback is minor 2. street has been made a cul -de-sac and is no longer considered a major thoroughfare. 3. encroachment does not cause any visibility hazards for traffic. 4. bow windows are allowed in front and rear yards but not in side yards which is a cause for confusion and regulation is not uniform. CONCLUSION 1 . variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. 2. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried 4-0.