|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2017 12:15:33 PM
Creation date
6/13/2016 2:18:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
flaw BOA/3/22/90/Minutes <br /> Page 4 <br /> 3. addition will not cause additional traffic hazard. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1 . variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 2: variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 1957. Withdrawn by applicant. <br /> 1958. Kruschke/Jones grant a variance of 0.5 ft, more or less , from the <br /> required total combined side yards; <br /> FINDING OF FACT: . <br /> 1 . minimum side yard is complied with on each side, variance requested <br /> pertains to the combined side yard total . <br /> 2. variation is minimal , only 0.5 ft. <br /> 3. property is located in an area of substantial nonconformity with respect <br /> to building location requirements and several variances have been granted <br /> to other properties for similar situations. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1 . proven case of unnecessary hardship. <br /> 2. variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without <br /> injustice to applicant. <br /> 3. variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> 4. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried 4-0. <br /> 1959. Quackenbush/Jones grant a variance of 46 .25 ft, more or less, from the <br /> required setback from normal high water mark; <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1 . variances have been granted for the improvement of other cottages in this <br /> complex. <br /> 2; this cottage #13 is farther from the lake than the adjacent cottage which <br /> was granted a variance. <br /> 3. the additions to the cottage will not encroach further towards the lake. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1 . variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. <br /> 2. variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried 4-0. <br /> 4). APPEALS HELD IN ABEYANCE: <br /> a). #1903 - Snittler - Montrose - P.H. 9/28/89 <br /> no action, verification of road vacation pending. <br /> b ). #1950 - Coyle - Madison - P.H. 2/22/90 <br /> Quackenbush/Harvey grant a variance of 8 parking spaces from required <br /> total parking subject to the following condition: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.