|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2016 9:48:34 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOA 12/22/94 MINUTES Now PAGE 2 <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . During roof re-shingle structural damage disclosed and <br /> replacing roof rafters necessary. <br /> 2) . For roof longevity pitch was increased. <br /> 3) . All work over existing footprint and is setback further from <br /> centerline than is majority of residence. <br /> 4) . Property is in an area of numerous nonconforming structures <br /> with numerous variances being granted. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2588 . Appeal by Ralph & Catherine Rio for a variance from maximum <br /> square footage of accessory buildings as provided by Section <br /> 10. 04 (1) to permit accessory building as located across from 1999 <br /> Skyline Drive being Lot #8 , Skyline Plat - Section 29 , Town of <br /> Pleasant Springs. <br /> IN FAVOR: R. Rio OPPOSED: --- <br /> COMMUNICATION: Town Board <br /> GASRILL/DREPS to deny requested Variance from allowable square <br /> footage of accessory buildings in residence district to permit <br /> storage shed as constructed. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . 10 x 12 Accessory building replaces former 10 x 10 metal <br /> building. <br /> 2) . Building location same and same slab utilized. <br /> 3) . Building erected without necessary permits. <br /> 4) . Previous Variance (#1623) was granted to accommodate new <br /> garage as lot across street with residence on it cannot accommodate <br /> accessory building. <br /> 5) . Needed storage should be accommodated within residential <br /> garage. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> IL, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.