Laserfiche WebLink
,, BOA 5/26/94 MIN <br /> PAGE 2 <br /> 1) . Applicant amends request to relocate garage behind residence <br /> and withdraws requested setback variance. <br /> 2) . The variance, as granted, will equal, or continue building <br /> line encroachment of residence. <br /> 3) . Property is in an area of numerous nonconforming structures <br /> with numerous variances being granted. <br /> 4) . Project in conjunction with other additions to residence not <br /> needing variances. <br /> CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinances as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2510. Appeal by Vito Brunetti for a variance from required <br /> sideyard as provided by Section 10. 07 (7) to permit proposed <br /> boathouse and also for a Special Exception Permit as provided by <br /> Section 11. 05 (3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet <br /> of Lake Kegonsa at 3038 Shadyside Drive being Lot #3 Crystal <br /> Springs Park - Section 30, Town of Pleasant Springs. <br /> (Ir IN FAVOR: V. Brunetti, N. Everson, M. Colby OPPOSED: --- <br /> COMMUNICATION: --- <br /> DREPS/GASRILL to hold request for variance and special exception <br /> permit in abeyance until June Hearing to allow applicant to explore <br /> revised location of boathouse and to provide revised fill and grade <br /> plan. Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2511. Appeal by Leo Duren for a variance from required sign <br /> setback from road as provided by Section 10. 83 (1) to permit on- <br /> premise pylon sign at 5305 W. River Road in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 - <br /> Section 22, Town of Westport. <br /> IN FAVOR: G. Stone OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board <br /> GASRILL/DREPS to deny requested variance from setback from right- <br /> of-way to permit addition/alteration of existing pylon sign. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Sign frame, as located, was made nonconforming by latest <br /> amendment to sign ordinance. <br /> 2) . Principal use of business at this location has changed from <br /> convenience store to custom sewing shop. <br /> 3) . Only 1 support member of sign encroaches into required <br /> setback. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> L <br />