|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2016 9:48:34 AM
Creation date
6/15/2016 3:34:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOA 5/26/94 MIN <br /> PAGE 9 <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . The project as planned, with specified conditions; will not <br /> result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, <br /> sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life, or safe and <br /> healthful conditions. Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2507 . Maddrell - Roxbury - 4/28/94 P.H. <br /> IN FAVOR: C. Bongard OPPOSED: --- COMMUNCATION: --- <br /> DREPS/OUACKENBUSH to grant both variance from setback to Normal <br /> high watermark and Special Exception Permit, with conditions, to <br /> fill and grade within 300 feet of Fish Lake as proposed. <br /> 2-2 (Klopp and Gaskill) - no. Motion failed. <br /> #2502 . Kornetzke - Dunn 4/28/94 P.H. <br /> IN FAVOR: D. Kornetzke OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- <br /> KLOPP/GASRILL to grant variances of 4 . 36 feet from required setback <br /> to normal high watermark and 30 feet from required rearyard to <br /> permit second addition to existing single familly residence as <br /> proposed. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Project will not expand footprint of existing home. <br /> 2) . Variance #1915 granted to allow deck to extend into required <br /> setback to normal high watermark not more than 12 feet. <br /> 3) . Letters of support from neighbors and town were received. <br /> 4) . Property is in an area of numerous nonconforming structures <br /> with numerous similar variances being granted. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> 2) . Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible <br /> without injustice to applicant. <br /> Motion carried - 4-0. <br /> #2497 . Nicholson - Oregon - 4/28/94 p.h. <br /> IN FAVOR: D. Weber OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board <br /> * Variance request is withdrawn by agent at this hearing. <br /> GASRILL/DREPS to grant with conditions permit to fill, grade and <br /> retaining wall as per revised plan submitted, showing pool in <br /> complying location, to allow construction inground pool and <br /> accompaning landscaping within 300 feet of Lake Harriet. <br /> CONDITIONS: <br /> 1) . That plans and specifications be prepared by a licensed <br /> engineer within the scope of the application, and filed with the <br /> Cir Zoning Department before commencement of any work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.