1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA Minutes/8/22/91 Page 3 Lir CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. Motion carried - 3-0. #2158. Appeal by C.A. Grant & Sons, agent for Joe Daniels for a variance from required maximum height and number of signs permitted as provided by Section 10.74(19) to permit construction of on-premise pylon sign at 5902 Haase Road in the SW 1/4 NW 1/4 - Section 9, Town of Burke. IN FAVOR: P. Schneider OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board. Arts/Rendall to grant variances of 11 feet from maximum height of on-premise sign also from number of signs permitted per parcel to permit construction of on-premise pylon sign as proposed. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Sign ordinance specifies sign may not exceed 50 feet above center line grade of adjoining highway and grade of property is 11 feet above said centerline. 2). Lot is large and commercially zoned and abuts Interstate 90-94. 3). Existing commercial building has multiple users who are dependent upon visibility to interstate truckers to earn livelihood. 4). New sign ordinance restrictions prohibit uses that were afforded to established businesses. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without Cr injustice to applicant. 2). Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. Motion carried - 3-0. 2159. Appeal by Bruce Rosen for a variance from required maximum height of boathouse as provided by Section 10.05(3) to permit construction of boathouse at 4525 Fox Bluff Lane being Lot #3, CSM 6004 located in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 Section 5, So. Town of Westport. IN FAVOR: B. Rosen, J. Stapelton, K. Schubert, C. Opitz OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board, Department of Natural Resources. Arts/Quackenbush to grant with condition variance of 4 feet from maximum height of boathouse above normal high watermark to permit construction of new boathouse as proposed. CONDITION: 1). That atop boathouse there shall be no railing, no decking or no deck usage. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Boathouse is to be constructed at 12 feet in height, however grade at requested setback is 4 feet above normal high watermark. 2). Applicant proposes 10 foot setback from normal high watermark in order to maintain natural shoreline asthetics and to prevent structural damage due to ice heave. 3). Applicant proposes a track-system to dolly boats inside. 4). 12 foot height is needed to accommodate owners watercraft. 5). At 10 foot setback from normal high watermark a minimal amount of disturbance to trees and shoreland vegetation. Limw CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. s