1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA MINUTES/7/25/91 Page 4 IN FAVOR: G. Stroupe OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board, Department of Natural Resources. Clark-Gaskill/Arts to deny request variance from required setback to normal high watermark to permit garage and breezeway addition. } FINDING OF FACT: 1). The residence was constructed with a variance and no garage intended (Variance #366 - July 1975). 2). Property is only remaining residence on North side of South Road in the township. The adjoining properties all in Village of DeForest, and have the benefit of public sewer. 3). Applicant's wish to enchance property in order to accommodate sale. 4). Applicant's wish to utilize existing gravel drive and indicate unwillingness to seek modification or alternate plan. CONCLUSION: ► 1). Unnecessary hardship was not proven. Motion carried - 3-0. #2151 Appeal by T.L.C. Services, Agent for Robert Jaworski, for a variance from required sideyard and setback to normal high water mark as provided by Sections 10.16(6)(a) and 11.03(2) to permit accessory building as constructed. ALSO for a Special Exception Permit as provided by Section 11.05(3) to permit filling, grading, etc. , within 300 feet of Lake Kegonsa at 2142 Colladay Point Drive being Lot 37, Colladay Point, Section 23, Town of Dunn. IN FAVOR: D. Nelson, R & F Jaworski, D. Moyer OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town Board, Department of Natural Resources. Arts/Clark-Gaskill to holdin abeyance until August Hearing to allow Board to view the property. Motion carried - 3-0. #2152 Appeal by Mark Gerhardt, Agent for Jack Way Builders, for a variance from required minimum lot width at building setback line as provided by Section 10.05(4)(a) to permit construction of single family residence at 2130 Native Place being Lot 32, American Heritage, Section 3, Town of Cottage Grove. IN FAVOR: G & B Wara OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- Quackenbush/Arts to grant, with condition, variance of 23 more or less feet from required lot width at front building line of proposed residence. CONDITION: 1). That actual lot width to be determined by the setback from right-of-way of the proposed residence to be no closer than setback from right-of-way of existing residence as exists on Lot #31. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Lot is 38.6 feet wide at road right-of-way. 2). Residence would have to be setback from right-of-way 85 feet to achieve 100 feet of lot width at front building line. 3). Plat, American Heritage, was created prior to 100 foot lot width requirement. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by others. 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. C