Laserfiche WebLink
BOA MINUTES/November 18, 1993 <br /> Page 4 <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> Deck: 1) . Variance is necessary to provide right enjoyed by <br /> others. <br /> 2) . Variance is not contrary to rights Of othesr or to the public <br /> interest. <br /> Special Exception: 1) . The project as planned, with specified <br /> conditions; will not result in substantial detriment to navigable <br /> waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic <br /> life, or safe and healthful conditions. Motion carried - 5-0. <br /> #2463 Appeal by Jay V. Bohnsack for a variance from required <br /> setback from road as provided by Section 10. 17 (5) (b) to <br /> permit a Single Family Residence as constructed at 3781 <br /> Janelle Lane being Lot 7 , Block 3 , Bohnsack Subdivision <br /> First Addition, Section 20, Town of Cottage Grove. <br /> IN FAVOR: L & J Harbort, K. Grote OPPOSED: --- <br /> COMMUNICATION: --- <br /> Dreps/Gaskill to deny requested variance from required setback to <br /> right-of-way of Janelle Lane for residence as constructed. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Owner/builder errored in foundation placement. <br /> 2) . Adjoining property was denied similar variance request <br /> (Variance #1381) . <br /> 3) . No other similarly approved variances in subdivison. <br /> 4) . Applicant has deep lot, and meeting required setback was very <br /> obtainable. <br /> 5) . Applicant has in process rezone application to correct <br /> sideyard encroachment. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> 1) . Unnecessry hardship was not proven. <br /> Motion carried - 5-0. <br /> #2464 Appeal by James and Karen Breunig for a variance from <br /> required rearyard as provided by Section 10. 07 (8) to <br /> permit proposed addition to existing <br /> residence at 7208 Inama Road in the SE1/4 <br /> SW1/4 Section 16 , Town of Roxbury. <br /> IN FAVOR: J. Breunig OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: - <br /> Gaskill/Klopp to deny requested rearyard variance to permit <br /> enclosed porch addition to existing residence. <br /> FINDING OF FACT: <br /> 1) . Applicant has recently constructed home on smaller lot. <br /> 2) . Applicant had rezoned to R-3 to accommodate residence. <br /> 3) . Plan modification could allow desired structure without need <br /> for variance. <br /> kir 4) . Open deck would be permitted to extend 12 feet into required <br /> rearyard. <br />