1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOA 2/25/93 Minutes Page 2 • CONCLUSION: 1). The project, as planned, with specified conditions, will not result in substantial detriment to navigable waters by erosion, sedimentation, impairment of fish or aquatic life or to safe or healthful conditions. Motion carried - 3-0. Variance: Gaskill/Dreps to deny variance of required sideyard to permit entry addition to existing residence as constructed. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Zoning permit for residence showed crawl space. Owner made change to full basement by phone call to Zoning Staff. House was constructed with four feet of basement walls exposed. 2). Original house plans show permitted at-grade stoop on east side. Raised entryway is one of three existing entrances to house (raised side stoop, lake side deck, proposed breezeway). 3). Creating berm to raise east side grade to raised door elevation would require 8 more or less foot wall and revised drainage plans. New Special Exception Permit would be required. 4). Lower level entry with interior stairway is structurally difficult but possible. CONCLUSION: 1). Hardship is self-imposed; legal hardship not proven. Motion carried to deny variance - 3-0. #2330. Krumins - Windsor - 11/19/92 P.H. (Or IN FAVOR: Iola Krumins OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- STAFF REPORT: Zoning Administrator Bill Fleck presented affadavits from previous owner, neighbors and Windsor Sanitary District. Information submitted indicates this is a nonconforming multiple-family use. Dreps/Gaskill to grant variance of 16.25 more or less feet from required setback from road to permit first floor and second floor porches as constructed over existing footprint. FINDING OF FACT: 1). Staff report settles question of "grandfathered" status of multiple family use. 2). Porch was built over an existing foundation and extends no closer to the roadway than the previous porch. CONCLUSION: 1). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. 2). Variance preserves the Zoning Ordinance as much as possible without injustice to applicant. Motion carried - 3-0. #2324. Williams - Dunn - 11/19/92 P.H. IN FAVOR: Mr. & Mrs. Ted Williams OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: --- Gaskill/Dreps to grant permit to fill and grade as completed within 300 feet of Lake Kegonsa as per plans and specifications submitted by Roland F. Sarko and Association, Inc. with conditions: CONDITIONS: 1). That plans and specifications be prepared by a licensed engineer within the scope of the application, and filed with the Zoning Department before commencement of any work. 2). That all work be performed in compliance with approved engineering standards and all applicable governmental rules and regulations particularly Section 11.05(4) of Dane County Ordinance.