|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
BOA
>
BOA Minutes
>
2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2016 10:26:25 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 10:26:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOA MINUTES 6/28/2001 <br /> PAGE 3 <br /> 4). Sign is located on the outside of a curve. <br /> 5). Posted speed limit on this portion of C.T.H. F is 25 m.p.h. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance is not contrary to the rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> 2). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to the <br /> applicant. <br /> Motion carried- 5-0. <br /> #3137. Appeal by Timothy Neitzel for variances from required lot width,maximum lot <br /> coverage and sideyard as provided by Sections 11.03(1), 10.05(1), 10.04(1) and 10.05(7) <br /> to permit lot reconfiguration by Certified Survey Map at 2372 County Highway AB <br /> being Lots 7,8,9, and parts of Lots 6 and 10,Block 2, Colladay Park and adjacent lands in <br /> the NW 1/4 NE 1/4 - Section 23, Town of Dunn. <br /> IN FAVOR: T. Matson OPPOSED: -- COMMUNICATIONS: Co. Hwy. <br /> Sayles /Long to approve,with conditions, requested variances from lot width required <br /> in the shoreland district also to grant variance of 4.2 feet from required sideyard and a <br /> 768 square foot variance to allow accessory building as exists on proposed on Lot#2. <br /> CONDITIONS: <br /> 1). That issues raised by Dane Co. Highway Department,regarding access permitting <br /> and stormwater management plan,be resolved to the satisfaction of the Highway <br /> Department. <br /> Finding of fact: <br /> 1). Applicant proposes to reconfigure 3 full lots and 2 partial lots into 2 larger CSM lots. <br /> 2). On the 2 proposed lots, 1 will have existing residence and the other will have <br /> accessory building only. <br /> 3). Garage on proposed Lot#2 was conforming prior to proposed lot re-configuration. <br /> 4). Project will substantially improve lot sizes over the originally platted 44 foot lot <br /> widths. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. <br /> 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried- 5-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.