Laserfiche WebLink
BOA MINUTES 4/26/01 <br /> PAGE 2 <br /> far #3126. Appeal by David Walker for a variance from required sideyard as provided by <br /> Sections 10.07(7) and 10.16(6)to permit residential garage construction at 1401 Range <br /> Trail being N 1/2 Lots 1 and 2,Block#5, Plat of Paoli, Section 3, Town of Montrose. <br /> IN FAVOR: D. Walker OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town <br /> Board, J. Solberg <br /> Klopp/ Kay to grant variance of 5 feet from required sideyard to permit residence <br /> garage as proposed. <br /> Finding of fact: <br /> 1). Applicant has lot 66' x 132' and being a corner lot has to maintain setback from 2 <br /> roads. <br /> 2). New mound septic system takes up most of available rearyard. <br /> 3). With 10 foot separation with residence garage could legally sit 4 feet from side lot <br /> line. <br /> 4). Applicant need garage for vehicles and yard maintenance equipment. <br /> 5). Applicant will also be required to obtain a variance from the State Plumbing code for <br /> distance of building to the toe of a mound. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. <br /> 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried. 3 - 1. (long—no) <br /> #3127. Appeal by Douglas & Linda Nelson for a variance from required setback from <br /> road as provided by Section 10.17(3)to permit addition/alteration of existing residence at <br /> 9549 Lee Valley road in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 25, Town of Perry. <br /> IN FAVOR: J. Ekstrom OPPOSED: --- COMMUNICATION: Town <br /> Board <br /> Klopp/Ross to grant variance of 7.6 feet from required setback to right-of-way of Lee <br /> Valley Road to permit structural alteration of existing residence as proposed. <br /> Finding of fact: <br /> 1). Original portion of residence built in the 1890's with additions in the 1920's and <br /> 1970's . <br /> 2). Proposed addition will duplicate existing building dimensions of 12 x 12 feet. <br /> 3). Existing encroaching area is in need of rebuild due to failing roof and crumbling <br /> foundation. <br /> Conclusion: <br /> 1). Variance preserves the zoning ordinance as much as possible without injustice to <br /> applicant. <br /> 2). Variance is not contrary to rights of others or to the public interest. <br /> Motion carried. 3-0. (Kay-absent) <br />