|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPREZ-0000-04301
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Rezones
>
0000 YR
>
DCPREZ-0000-04301
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2016 3:21:17 PM
Creation date
11/3/2016 3:21:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Rezone/CUP
Rezone/CUP - Type
Rezone
Petition Number
04301
Town
Verona Township
Section Numbers
3
AccelaLink
DCPREZ-0000-04301
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Shary Bisgard <br /> Page 2 <br /> The open space corridor which will be recommended for <br /> serious investigation by the Peripheral Development Report <br /> essentially is a band of land about 1 mile wide between the <br /> County Park and the Golf Course, and including the major <br /> ridgelines. The site of the proposed commercial rezoning <br /> lies within this recommended corridor, and at a highly <br /> visible highway intersection. There is room for discussion <br /> about what types of activity might be compatible with a <br /> visual concept of "open space", but nobody's definition <br /> includes retail banking. <br /> The question of open space preservation was also considered <br /> by the Southwest Sector Intergovernmental Forum, a <br /> committee created by the Regional Planning Commission <br /> consisting of members from the Towns of Middleton and <br /> Verona, and the Cities of Middleton, Verona, Madison, and <br /> Fitchburg. The Southwest Sector Development and Open Space <br /> Study reported by this committee in January 1988, presented <br /> several alternative open space concepts for the Southwest <br /> Sector and recommended Alternative III for further study. <br /> Although the committee's recommendation differs in several <br /> important respects from the recommendations of the <br /> Peripheral Development Study, the site of the proposed bank <br /> is within open space corridors proposed by both. <br /> Maintaining visual separation between urban communities is <br /> an important regional and local objective, and no approval <br /> for any type of more intensive development should be <br /> considered here until the interest and possibilities for <br /> open space retention are fully explored. <br /> 2) In the event that the proposed bank site is not ultimately <br /> recommended for less intensive uses, there still has been <br /> no detailed planning for the urban development of this <br /> area. Approval of a branch bank here would establish <br /> commercial uses in the Five Points area, and could result <br /> in pressures for further strip development along these <br /> roadways. This precedent could seriously compromise the <br /> ability to plan rationally for eventual urbanization, if <br /> urbanization was the policy decision. The Five Points area <br /> is part of a drainage basin that could easily be served by <br /> gravity sanitary sewer interceptors the City of Madison <br /> expects to build to serve lands to the north and east. The <br /> City's Peripheral Development Study determined that the <br /> lands north of the ridgeline between Madison and Verona <br /> could be served by the City of Madison. If this area were <br /> to be recommended for urban development, the City of <br /> Madison would require preparation of a comprehensive <br /> neighborhood development plan before approving any <br /> intensive use. As noted elsewhere, the preliminary <br /> recommendation is that this area not be recommended for <br /> intensive uses (such as banks) . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.