|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2008-00696
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2000s
>
2008
>
DCPZP-2008-00696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2017 1:10:40 PM
Creation date
2/6/2017 1:10:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2008-00696
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'.Dane County Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 2 of 7 <br /> July 24,2008 <br /> ,! to two fuel tanks. He said the shed does not interfere with visibility exiting or entering the farm <br /> driveway. <br /> 5. In response to questions from Board members, Henning asserted there is no additional runoff to <br /> the adjacent drainage ditch, or contamination from animal waste resulting from the shed addition. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1) Unnecessary Hardship: Denying the variance would unreasonably prevent the use of the property <br /> for its continued permitted agricultural purpose and be unnecessarily burdensome. Practical <br /> considerations associated with calf-feeding require the proximity of the shed to the farmhouse. <br /> 2) Unique Limitations of the Property: The owner increased the size of a small existing agricultural <br /> building by a modest amount, so that it does not extend closer than the adjacent board fence. The <br /> type of shed and roof dictated the location and type of addition. <br /> 3) No Harm to Public Interests: The addition does not obstruct visibility for traffic on Muller Road or <br /> for the adjacent driveway. The Town approved the encroachment into the minimum setback from the <br /> right-of-way on a Town road. <br /> Motion carried: 3 — 1 (Studz, no). <br /> 2. Appeal 3533. Appeal by Brian & Barrett Martin (Ron Klaas, D'Onofrio Kottke & Associates, agent) <br /> for variances from minimum required lot width at the building setback line and minimum required lot <br /> area for an existing substandard lot in the Shoreland District as provided by Sections 11.03(1) and <br /> 10.05(4), Dane County Code of Ordinances, to permit removal of existing house and construction of <br /> new single-family residence and possible Certified Survey Map at 4336 Jordan Drive, being Lot 36, <br /> Block 1, Brictson Park and part of vacated Jordan Drive in the SW 1/4 SE 1/4, Section 8, Town of <br /> Dunn. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS: Town of Dunn: 06/02/2008 Acknowledgment; <br /> 07/21/2008 Action: Town Board "recommends approval...conditioned upon them keeping surface <br /> water run-off from this property off the adjacent properties." <br /> 07/22/2008: Letter from Cami Peterson, Water Regulation and Zoning Specialist, WDNR, <br /> recommending denial of Appeal 3533. <br /> VARIANCES REQUESTED: Purpose: Allow removal and replacement of existing single-family <br /> residence on a substandard property in the Shoreland district and allow Certified Survey Map, <br /> if required (existing detached garage and boathouse will remain). <br /> • <br /> Lot Area Variance: <br /> Minimum Lot area required: 15,000 square feet (SF). <br /> Actual Lot Area: 9,474 SF as per survey <br /> VARIANCE NEEDED: 5,526 SF <br /> Lot Width Variance <br /> Minimum lot width at building setback line required: 100 feet. <br /> Actual Lot width: 40 feet at building setback line, as platted; 39.96 feet as surveyed. <br /> VARIANCE NEEDED: 60 feet at the building setback line as platted; 60.04 feet as <br /> surveyed. <br /> IN FAVOR: Ron Klaas, D'Onofrio Kottke &Associates, Madison, WI —agent. <br /> OPPOSED: None <br /> ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION: The Martins' property consists of two separate <br /> pieces of property, which are considered as one lot for zoning purposes. However, combining the two <br /> pieces by Certified Survey Map (CSM) would eliminate any question of legal status, and is desirable. <br /> Staff Note: Schutte pointed out that the lot width and area variances would be required to create a <br /> new CSM lot, so were included for that potentiality. <br /> Motion: Studz/Long to grant variance of 5,526 square feet from minimum 15,000 square feet of <br /> required lot area: and variance of 60 feet at building setback line as platted (60.04 feet as surveyed) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.