Laserfiche WebLink
Dane County Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 2 of 9 <br /> April 24,2008 <br /> 2. Lowe stated that the lot area shown is measured to the current water level; if measured to the <br /> Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), he stated there is 18,500 square feet of lot area. <br /> 3. The original house was built in 1961, according to Lowe. A Zoning Permit for a 6 foot by 12 foot <br /> pump house/shed addition on the north side of the house was issued to Lowe in 1977. <br /> 4. Lowe recently removed and replaced the pump house/shed on the existing footprint because it <br /> had been damaged by high water levels of Fish Lake. He also replaced some structural members <br /> of the existing porch and replaced a concrete stoop with a new 5 foot by 9 foot wooden deck and <br /> steps, both on the south side of the house. The existing house and all additions meet the <br /> minimum side yards, setback from the OHWM and maximum lot coverage requirements. <br /> 5. Lowe stated he obtained a building permit from the Town Building Inspector to remove and <br /> replace the shed. Neither he nor the Town Building Inspector apparently knew that he needed to <br /> obtain a Dane County Zoning Permit. <br /> 6. The Lowe's house and lot, along with others in this subdivision, have been affected by high water <br /> levels of Fish Lake in recent years. The lake is being pumped by the County and WDNR to try to <br /> maintain a more livable level. <br /> Conclusions: <br /> 1) Unnecessary Hardship: Although ignorance of the need for a Zoning Permit and reliance upon the <br /> advice of the local building inspector are not valid reasons for granting a variance, the additions <br /> allow continued use of the property for its permitted residence purpose, and denying the variance <br /> would be unnecessarily burdensome. <br /> 2) Unique Limitations of the Property: The increasing water level of Fish Lake in recent years is an <br /> unusual situation affecting this house and lot. The lot as created in 1957 was much larger (before <br /> rising lake levels reduced the usable lot area). The applicant cannot obtain additional lot width <br /> from neighbors, whose lots are also substandard pre-existing non-conforming Shoreland parcels. <br /> 3) No Harm to Public Interests: The additions were replacements, not additions, on the existing <br /> footprints for the most part, and have no additional impact on the Shoreland district. <br /> Hamre suggested that the Zoning Division should communicate the requirements for County Zoning <br /> Permits to Town governments generally and to Town Building Inspectors particularly, to help avoid <br /> misunderstandings, subsequent Zoning Division enforcement, and unnecessary variance applications. <br /> Motion carried: 3—0. <br /> 2. Appeal 3524. Appeal by Harbort Living Trust et al. (Ron Williamson, Williamson Surveying and <br /> Associates, LLC, agent) for variances from minimum lot widths, minimum lot areas, minimum side <br /> yards and minimum rear yard as provided by Sections 10.071(4), 10.08(4), 10.08(7), and 10.08(8), <br /> Dane County Code of Ordinances, to permit proposed lot line reconfiguration by Certified Survey Map <br /> for one existing single-family residence, five existing multi-family residential buildings and one existing <br /> duplex, at and East of 1917, 1919 and 1921 Sherman Avenue et al., located in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4, <br /> Section 12, Town of Madison. <br /> COMMUNICATIONS: 03/10/2008 Town of Madison Acknowledgement; 04/18/2008 Letter received <br /> 04/21/2008 from D. Richard Rose, Director of Public Works, Town of Madison: On 04/04/2008, the <br /> Town Board voted to recommend approval of both Variance Appeal 3524 and Rezone Petition 9882 <br /> "with the Condition that a Certified Survey Map be recorded." <br /> VARIANCES REQUESTED: Purpose: Rezoning and Certified Survey Map to bring existing <br /> uses into compliance and permit proposed condominium use. <br /> Variances Needed for Proposed Lot 2: <br /> Minimum required lot width at building setback line for lot with single-family residence and <br /> multiple-family residential uses: 60 feet (Sections 10.08(4)(b)1., 10.08(4)(b)2., 10.071(4)(b)) <br /> Proposed lot width at building setback line: 52.4 feet <br />