|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DCPZP-2018-00233
DaneCounty-Planning
>
Zoning
>
1 Permits
>
2010s
>
2018
>
DCPZP-2018-00233
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2019 9:21:17 AM
Creation date
7/3/2018 1:26:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Zoning Permits
AccelaLink
DCPZP-2018-00233
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation <br /> Proposed Golden Oil Refueling Station <br /> Stoughton, Wisconsin <br /> PSI Project No. 0092822 <br /> Page 4 <br /> with a calibrated hand penetrometer to aid in evaluating the soil strength characteristics. The <br /> values of strength tests performed on soil samples obtained by the Standard Penetration Test <br /> Method (SPT) are considered approximate, recognizing that the SPT method provides a <br /> representative but somewhat disturbed soil sample. The laboratory testing was performed in <br /> general accordance with the respective ASTM methods, as applicable, and the results are <br /> shown on the boring logs in the Appendix. <br /> DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br /> General <br /> A description of the subsurface conditions encountered at the test boring locations is shown <br /> on the Soil Boring Logs. The lines of demarcation shown on the logs represent approximate <br /> boundaries between the various soil classifications. It must be recognized that the soil <br /> descriptions are considered representative for the specific test hole location, but that variations <br /> may occur between and beyond the sampling intervals and boring locations. Soil depths, <br /> topsoil and layer thicknesses, and demarcation lines utilized for preconstruction planning <br /> should not be expected to yield exact and final quantities. A summary of the major soil profile <br /> components is described in the following paragraphs. <br /> Soil Conditions <br /> The surface at B-2 through B-5, and B-7 consisted of about 2 to 8 inches of brown to black <br /> silty clay or sandy silt, classified as topsoil or topsoil fill. The surface at B-1 and SW-2 <br /> consisted of about 12 inches of sandy gravel to gravelly sand fill. At B-6, the surface consisted <br /> of 3 inches of asphalt pavement underlain by 3 inches of base course. The surface materials <br /> at SW-1 consisted of 3 inches of asphalt pavement underlain by 4 inches of concrete. <br /> The surface materials at B-1, B-2, B-3, B-6, SW-1, and SW-2 were underlain by fill and <br /> possible fill to depths ranging from about 6 to 8 feet (EL. 867.0 to EL. 869.1) below the <br /> surface. These materials were somewhat variable in composition, consisting of sandy gravel, <br /> silty clay, loamy sand, and loam. At B-6, the fill was underlain by black silty clay classified as <br /> possible buried topsoil to a depth of about 8.5 feet (EL. 864.7). <br /> The underlying natural soils at these borings, and those beneath the surface materials at the <br /> remaining locations generally consisted of tan to brown silty sand; brown to gray sandy gravel; <br /> brown silty clay; and gray to black loam. The natural cohesive soils were generally soft to stiff <br /> in comparative consistency, with unconfined compressive strength estimates typically between <br /> about 0.75 to 2.00 tons per square foot (tsf). The natural granular soils encountered were <br /> loose to dense in relative density, with N-values typically between 9 bpf and 40 blows for 1 <br /> inch of sampler penetration. <br /> The fill, possible fill, and possible buried topsoil materials were classified as such based on <br /> their varied visual characteristics and composition. However, it must be recognized that in the <br /> absence of foreign substances and/or debris within the soil samples obtained, it is often <br /> difficult to distinguish between natural soils and clean soil fill. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.